Nutrient Dynamics in Flooded Wetlands. Ii: Model Application

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2013

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

Yes

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

Yes
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Average

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

In this paper, the authors applied and evaluated the wetland nutrient model that was described in Paper I. Hydrologic and water quality data from a small restored wetland located on Kent Island,Maryland, which is part of the Delmarva Peninsula on the eastern shores of the Chesapeake Bay, was used for this purpose. The model was assessed through various methods against the observed data in simulating nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and total suspended sediment (TSS) dynamics. Time series plots of observed and simulated concentrations and loads generally compared well; better performance was demonstrated with dissolved forms of nitrogen, i.e., ammonia and nitrate. Through qualitative and quantitative sensitivity analysis, dominant processes in the study wetland were scrutinized. Nitrification, plant uptake, and mineralization were the most important processes affecting ammonia. Denitrification in the sediment layer and diffusion to bottom sediments were identified as key processes for nitrate. Settling and resuspension were the most important processes for particulate matter (organic N, sediment) and sediment-bound phosphate (inorganic P). Order of parameter sensitivities and dominant processes exhibited seasonality. Uncertainty bands created from Monte Carlo simulations showed that parameter uncertainty is relatively small; however, uncertainty in the wetland inflow rates and loading concentrations have much more bearing on model predictive uncertainty. N, P, and TSS mass balance analysis showed that the wetland removed approximately 23, 33, and 46%, respectively, of the incoming load (runoff + atmospheric deposition) over the two-year period, with more removal in year 1 (34, 43, and 55%, respectively), which had a long stretch of a dry period. The developed model can be employed for exploring wetland response to various climatic and input conditions, and for deeper understanding of key processes in wetlands. © 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Description

Keywords

Algae, Ammonia, Denitrification, Model, Nitrate, Nitrification, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Plant growth, Sediment, Water quality, Wetland, Nitrates, Vegetation, Algae, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Chesapeake Bay, Nitrate, Nitrification, Floods, Water quality, Ammonia, Wetlands, Wetland, Denitrification, Sediment, Model, Plant growth, Floods; Wetlands; Water quality; Sediment; Nitrogen; Phosphorus; Nitrification; Denitrification; Ammonia; Nitrates; Vegetation; Chesapeake Bay; Wetland; Water quality; Model; Sediment; Nitrogen; Phosphorus; Nitrification; Denitrification; Ammonia; Nitrate; Algae; Plant growth

Fields of Science

0208 environmental biotechnology, 0207 environmental engineering, 02 engineering and technology

Citation

WoS Q

Q3

Scopus Q

Q3
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
8

Source

Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

Volume

18

Issue

12

Start Page

1724

End Page

1738
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 5

Scopus : 13

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 36

SCOPUS™ Citations

13

checked on Feb 11, 2026

Page Views

2

checked on Feb 11, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
1.58268727

Sustainable Development Goals

6

CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION
CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION Logo