Ünver, Hamid Akın2021-01-292021-01-29201701305-47401305-4740https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/3814https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/261654This article makes an empirical exposition of militancy governance under state failure by focusing on ISIS (Islamic State in Iraq and Syria), YPG (People's Protection Units), Luhansk People's Republic and Donetsk People's Republic. Specifically, the article discusses how these groups mobilize different types of grievances and frame their propaganda to exert control over areas where states are weakened. Furthermore, how these groups engage in early modes of pre- and post-territorial control, form governance practices and prioritize particular areas for better administration are also elaborated in detail. Ultimately, the paper argues that Violent Non-State Actors (VNSAs) perform better in areas of low loyalty and high resource-generation and if its territorial ambitions are maximalist (expansionist). Through these variables, we are better able to judge how sustainable these groups will be in their respective territories and how should states approach local governance once these groups are defeated.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCivil WarNon-State ActorsGovernanceSyria-IraqUkraineArticle45832613N/AN/A261654