Yılmaz, Onurcanİşler, OzanYılmaz, Onurcan2021-01-092021-01-0920193978-100002365-7;978-036725857-3https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/3712https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429298097-6This chapter focuses on a question that remains in relative neglect in the management literature-whether intuitions support ethical and cooperative behavior. It provides an overview of the literature and discuses the emerging picture on dual-process accounts of morality and cooperation. Despite the growing scholarship on the pros and cons of intuitive managerial decision-making, the literature understandably prioritizes the aspects of strategic business decisions and consequent corporate financial performance. A comparison of the heuristics-and-biases, ­simple-heuristics, and naturalistic decision-making accounts indicated that expertise is built on regular feedback from a learning-friendly environment and that intuitions tend to be reliable when expertise matches the decision environment. Evidence on the dual-process accounts of cooperation indicates that both social heuristics and self-control may regulate intuitive cooperation to an extent dependent on the problem at hand and on the associations it may induce.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessBook Part10111310.1201/9780429298097-62-s2.0-85075647440N/AN/A