The Status Granted to Organizational Identity Characteristics: An Application of the Best-Worst Method and Regression Analysis

dc.authorscopusid36338123700
dc.authorscopusid57773008300
dc.contributor.authorTopaler, Ayşe Başak
dc.contributor.authorÇavdaroğlu, N.A.
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-19T15:05:15Z
dc.date.available2023-10-19T15:05:15Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.department-tempTopaler, B., Kadir Has University Department of Business Administration, Cibali Fatih, İstanbul,, Turkey; Çavdaroğlu, N.A., Kadir Has University Department of Business Administration, Cibali Fatih, İstanbul,, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractAccording to the traditional conceptualization in management literature, organizations gain status through demonstrations of superior performance. Criticizing this narrow focus on “achieved” status, this study identifies the status value ascribed to organizations within socially constructed systems of norms and values. Utilizing concepts offered by institutional research in organization theory, we propose historical legacy, endorsement, and prominence in the field as sources of ascribed status for organizational identity characteristics. The Turkish higher education field constitutes the empirical setting of our research. We conducted interviews with key stakeholders in this field (i.e., students, academicians, managers in industry, and high school counselors) to elicit the organizational characteristics they perceive as relevant for defining university identity. The status value ascribed to these identity characteristics was documented via surveys with separate samples of these four stakeholder groups using a relatively new but widely recognized MCDM method, the best-worst method (BWM). Our findings provide evidence for the view that institutions have a broad influence on social hierarchy systems, yet with some nuances. We discuss theoretical implications for the research on status in markets and practical implications for higher education institutions. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.en_US
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-91851-4_13en_US
dc.identifier.endpage360en_US
dc.identifier.issn0884-8289
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85133180609en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage335en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91851-4_13
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/4770
dc.identifier.volume326en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.khas20231019-Scopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Series in Operations Research and Management Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKitap Bölümü - Uluslararasıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBest-worst methoden_US
dc.subjectHigher education fielden_US
dc.subjectInstitutional theoryen_US
dc.subjectMulti-criteria decision-makingen_US
dc.subjectStatusen_US
dc.titleThe Status Granted to Organizational Identity Characteristics: An Application of the Best-Worst Method and Regression Analysisen_US
dc.typeBook Parten_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0e6c017c-c38d-4d9b-87ca-18e7d408116d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery0e6c017c-c38d-4d9b-87ca-18e7d408116d

Files