Mobile Crane Selection in Project Logistics Operations Using Best and Worst Method (bwm) and Fuzzy Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking According To Compromise Solution (marcos)

dc.authorwosidGorcun, Omer Faruk/ADF-0541-2022
dc.contributor.authorGorcun, Omer Faruk
dc.contributor.authorDogan, Gurkan
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-19T15:11:36Z
dc.date.available2023-10-19T15:11:36Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.department-temp[Gorcun, Omer Faruk] Kadir Has Univ, Fac Econ Adm & Social Sci, Dept Business Adm, Omer Faruk Gorcun Kadir Has St 1 34083, Fatih Istanbul, Turkey; [Dogan, Gurkan] Hareket Heavy & Lifting Project Transportat Co, Project Management Dept, Sekmen St 28, TR-34885 Sancaktepe Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractStatistics on occupational accidents published by international organizations show that mobile cranes are the riskiest heavy equipment among all crane types. The most significant reason for these crane accidents is the decision-makers' wrong selection of mobile cranes. Making misevaluations and selecting improper mobile cranes can cause many problems besides mobile crane accidents. In addition, selecting a mobile crane is a highly complicated decision-making problem, as there are many conflicting criteria and uncertainties. Besides, no commonly accepted criteria set is used to solve this decision-making problem in the literature. The current paper proposes the fuzzy BWM (Best and Worst Method) and fuzzy MARCOS (Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to COmpromise Solution) combination as a robust and practical decision-making tool that can overcome many complicated ambiguities. The suggested model has been applied to solve a mobile crane se-lection problem encountered by a large-scale project logistics and heavy transport company in Turkey. The acquired outcomes demonstrated that technical criteria are more influential than economic and quality criteria. The criterion Maximum hoist height in the technical criteria group is the most influential factor in selecting the best mobile crane option. In addition, the A1 Brand-L. 4.2 is the most appropriate alternative to meet the company's requirements. Finally, a comprehensive sensitivity analysis performed to test the validity and applicability of the model approves the robustness of the model.en_US
dc.identifier.citation6
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104729en_US
dc.identifier.issn0926-5805
dc.identifier.issn1872-7891
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85145265126en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104729
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/5125
dc.identifier.volume147en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000923470800001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.institutionauthorGörçün, Ömer Faruk
dc.khas20231019-WoSen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofAutomation in Constructionen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectOptimizationEn_Us
dc.subjectCriteriaEn_Us
dc.subjectMobile crane selectionen_US
dc.subjectFuzzy BWMen_US
dc.subjectOptimization
dc.subjectFuzzy MARCOSen_US
dc.subjectCriteria
dc.subjectProject logisticsen_US
dc.titleMobile Crane Selection in Project Logistics Operations Using Best and Worst Method (bwm) and Fuzzy Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking According To Compromise Solution (marcos)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication4d0f6004-dbe4-4e79-befd-457af3bb133f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery4d0f6004-dbe4-4e79-befd-457af3bb133f

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
5125.pdf
Size:
3.25 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Tam Metin / Full Text