A Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Terms Set-Based Ahp and Topsis Methodology for Fuel Coal Type Selection Problem of Industrial Facilities

dc.authorid Ayag, Zeki/0000-0003-4078-2804
dc.authorscopusid 24823628300
dc.authorscopusid 55943904700
dc.contributor.author Yucekaya, A.
dc.contributor.author Ayağ, Zeki
dc.contributor.author Ayağ, Z.
dc.contributor.other Industrial Engineering
dc.date.accessioned 2024-10-15T19:40:49Z
dc.date.available 2024-10-15T19:40:49Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.department Kadir Has University en_US
dc.department-temp Yucekaya A., Department of Industrial Engineering, Piri Reis University, 34940 Tuzla, İstanbul, Turkey Department of Industrial Engineering, Kadir Has University, 34083 Cibali, İstanbul, Turkey; Ayağ Z., Department of Industrial Engineering, Piri Reis University, 34940 Tuzla, İstanbul, Turkey Department of Industrial Engineering, Kadir Has University, 34083 Cibali, İstanbul, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract Coal is still used widely by both industrial facilities and coal fired power plants. Lignite, hard coal, coke, and imported coal are some alternatives. The coal has ash content, moisture content, heat rate, volatile matter, carbon content, sulphur content, and size that need to be considered as well as price. The suppliers provide coal products for each coal type, and the most appropriate coal product needs to be selected considering different parameters. Therefore, in this paper, a hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets-based AHP (HFLTS-AHP) and TOPSIS method are used to select the best coal type alternative for industrial facilities. As the HFLTS-AHP is used to weight the evaluation criteria, TOPSIS is utilized to rank the fuel coal type alternatives. The proposed methodology offers an innovative and novel approach to help industrial facilities select the appropriate coal product while balancing the outputs, such as carbon, sulphur, ash content, and so on. In another point of view, the motivation of this research is to help industrial firms find out the ultimate fuel coal alternative based on their needs. This objective is realized using the proposed approach that integrates the HFLTS-AHP and TOPSIS approaches for the related problem, also utilizing group decision making. Moreover, this approach is concreted by an Excel template that provides an effective tool for firms to realize the evaluation process without many tiresome fuzzy comparisons and complex calculations. Furthermore, in the paper, a real-life case study in Turkish industrial facilities is presented to demonstrate the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed approach to readers and practitioners. In this case, seven coal type options are evaluated in terms of eight criteria by three decision makers, and the best coal type alternative is determined. © 2024 Old City Publishing, Inc. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.citationcount 0
dc.identifier.endpage 496 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1542-3980
dc.identifier.issue 4-6 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85200628471
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q4
dc.identifier.startpage 473 en_US
dc.identifier.volume 43 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001312481800007
dc.identifier.wosquality Q1
dc.institutionauthor Ayağ, Zeki
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Old City Publishing en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Research Handbooks in Private and Commercial Law
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 0
dc.subject Fuel Coal Type Selection Problem en_US
dc.subject Group Decision Making en_US
dc.subject Hflts-Ahp en_US
dc.subject Mcdm en_US
dc.subject Topsis en_US
dc.title A Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Terms Set-Based Ahp and Topsis Methodology for Fuel Coal Type Selection Problem of Industrial Facilities en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 0
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 08cbab4b-8ed5-48fe-bb67-0488cc0af5a3
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 08cbab4b-8ed5-48fe-bb67-0488cc0af5a3
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 28868d0c-e9a4-4de1-822f-c8df06d2086a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 28868d0c-e9a4-4de1-822f-c8df06d2086a

Files