Hisarlıoğlu, Fatma Fulya

Profile Picture
Name Variants
H., Fatma Fulya
Hisarlıoğlu, F. F.
Hisarlıoğlu, FATMA FULYA
H.,Fatma Fulya
Hisarlıoğlu, Fatma Fulya
F. F. Hisarlıoğlu
Hisarlioglu,F.F.
FATMA FULYA HISARLIOĞLU
Hisarlioglu, Fatma Fulya
Hisarlıoğlu,F.F.
Hisarlıoğlu, F.
Fatma Fulya Hisarlıoğlu
Fatma Fulya, Hisarlioglu
F. Hisarlıoğlu
Hisarlioğlu F.
HISARLIOĞLU, Fatma Fulya
Fatma Fulya HISARLIOĞLU
HISARLIOĞLU, FATMA FULYA
Hisarlioglu,Fatma Fulya
Hisarlioglu, Fulya
Job Title
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi
Email Address
fulya.hisarlioglu@khas.edu.tr
ORCID ID
Scopus Author ID
57211288615
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID
Scholarly Output

3

Articles

3

Citation Count

0

Supervised Theses

0

Filters

2022 - 20243
Reset filters

Settings

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation Count: 7
    Contesting the Corrupt Elites, Creating the Pure People, and Renegotiating the Hierarchies of the International Order? Populism and Foreign Policy-Making in Turkey and Hungary
    (Oxford Univ Press, 2022) Hisarlioglu, Fulya; Yanik, Lerna K.; Korkut, Umut; Civelekoglu, Ilke
    This article explores the link between populism and hierarchies in international relations by examining the recent foreign policy-making in Turkey and Hungary-two countries run by populist leaders. We argue that when populists bring populism into foreign policy, they do so by contesting the corrupt elites of the international order and, simultaneously, attempt to create the pure people transnationally. The populists contest the eliteness and leadership status of these elites and the international order and its institutions, that is, the establishment, that these elites have come to represent by challenging them both in discourse and in action. The creation of the pure people happens by discursively demarcating the underprivileged of the international order as a subcategory based on religion and supplementing them with aid, thus mimicking the distributive strategies of populism, this time at the international level. We illustrate that when populist leaders, insert populism into foreign policies of their respective states, through contesting the corrupt elites and creating the pure people, the built-in vertical stratification mechanisms of populism that stems from the antagonistic binaries inherent to populism provide them with the necessary superiority and inferiority labels allowing them to renegotiate hierarchies in the international system in an attempt to modify the existing ones or to create new ones.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation Count: 0
    Identity, Cultural Heritage and the Politics of Sovereignty: Narrating Turkey and Greece Through Ayasofya
    (Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2024) Hisarlioglu, Fulya; Karagiannopoulou, Chara; Yanik, Lerna K.
    The article examines how Turkey's decision to reconvert the Ayasofya Museum into a mosque in June 2020 has shaped the 'self' and 'other' perceptions of the Greek and Turkish politicians of their respective countries by instrumentalizing the concept of sovereignty. We argue that what has been termed 'the right to sovereignty' by Turkey's leadership through the reconversion of Ayasofya-from a museum to a mosque-is indeed a 'sovereignty performance'. What is more, we deconstruct how 'sovereignty performances' centred on the conversion of Ayasofya produced by Turkey and Greece came to define, narrate and naturalize the essence and standards of 'national' and 'foreign/international' legitimizing mutual and respective identity perceptions held for themselves and each other.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation Count: 0
    The Rise and Fall of the Ottoman Empire's Religiously Inspired Status Symbols
    (Sage Publications Ltd, 2024) Hisarlioglu, Fulya; Yanik, Lerna K.
    How do status symbols rise and fall? Or better said, how does a status symbol become a status symbol and then cease to be one? We examine the rise and the fall of the Ottoman Empire's two socialization practices with the international society as status symbols: sending and receiving envoys/establishing permanent representation abroad and granting capitulations/extraterritoriality-economic and legal privileges to primarily European countries. We argue and illustrate that status symbols are products of hegemons of the time that dictate the status symbols of the international order at that particular point in time, with little or no recognition. These symbols emanating from the position that the states occupy in the hierarchy can be status-enhancing rather than status-achieving if these states perceive and locate themselves in the higher echelons of the hierarchy in the international order. We contribute to status-seeking literature by examining the rise and fall of status symbols in a non-Western setting and merging ideational and material factors in status-seeking literature.