Assessing the Renewable Energy Sources for Sustainable Energy Generation Systems: Interval-Valued Q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy SWARA-TOPSIS

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2026

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier Ltd

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Average

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

Renewable Energy Sources (RESs) help decarbonize power systems, but selecting among them is a challenging decision problem due to multiple, often conflicting, technical, economic, environmental, and health-related criteria. Consequently, numerous studies in the literature have attempted to address this decision-making issue using objective, subjective, and fuzzy decision-making procedures. However, there are still unaddressed research gaps in the literature, particularly regarding the explicit modeling of expert hesitation and ambiguity in real-world RES selection cases. The current study develops a decision-making model based on Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and Technique of Order Preference Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods integrated with Interval-Valued q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Sets (IV-q-ROFSs) to fill these gaps. Unlike previous studies that have predominantly applied conventional fuzzy MCDM techniques, our model introduces the first integration of IV-q-ROFS into RES selection. This novelty enables a more accurate representation of expert hesitation and uncertainty. The study is applied to a real industrial case in Turkey, where six RES alternatives are evaluated across 43 criteria by five senior experts under the supervision of a three-member professionals’ board. Furthermore, the structured robustness check and systematic literature mapping ensure that the proposed approach is methodologically robust and practically relevant for policymakers and energy planners. The application results of the developed model demonstrate that the estimated energy production potential of the RES and the effects of carcinogens generated from utilizing these energy sources are the critical factors influencing the selection of the most appropriate RESs. Solar energy ranked first among the alternatives. The applicability and validity of the developed model are examined by a comprehensive robustness check consisting of tests of sensitivity, comparison, and resilience to the rank reversal problem. Overall, the study provides (i) a novel methodological framework integrating IV-q-ROFS with SWARA and TOPSIS, (ii) empirical evidence from a comprehensive real-world RES selection case, and (iii) policy-relevant insights into the drivers of renewable energy adoption. © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.

Description

Keywords

Energy Consumption, Interval-Valued Q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy SWARA, Interval-Valued Q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy TOPSIS, Renewable Energy Sources, Sustainable Energy Generation

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

Fields of Science

Citation

WoS Q

Q1

Scopus Q

Q1
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A

Source

Expert Systems with Applications

Volume

298

Issue

Start Page

129735

End Page

PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 1

Scopus : 2

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 6

SCOPUS™ Citations

2

checked on Feb 05, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

2

checked on Feb 05, 2026

Page Views

7

checked on Feb 05, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
9.63949029

Sustainable Development Goals

2

ZERO HUNGER
ZERO HUNGER Logo

3

GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING Logo

7

AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY Logo

8

DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH Logo

9

INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Logo

10

REDUCED INEQUALITIES
REDUCED INEQUALITIES Logo

11

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES Logo

12

RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION Logo

13

CLIMATE ACTION
CLIMATE ACTION Logo

14

LIFE BELOW WATER
LIFE BELOW WATER Logo

15

LIFE ON LAND
LIFE ON LAND Logo

17

PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS Logo