Examining actor-partner effects between social dominance, relationship power, sexism, and marital quality

dc.authoridHarma, Mehmet/0000-0002-3955-1526
dc.authoridKafescioglu, Nilufer/0000-0001-7683-240X
dc.authorwosidHarma, Mehmet/A-3125-2015
dc.contributor.authorYmamgulyyeva, Aysoltan
dc.contributor.authorKafescioglu, Niluefer
dc.contributor.authorHarma, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-19T15:13:07Z
dc.date.available2023-10-19T15:13:07Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.department-temp[Ymamgulyyeva, Aysoltan] Michigan State Univ, Dept Human Dev & Family Studies, E Lansing, MI USA; [Kafescioglu, Niluefer] Ozyegin Univ, Dept Psychol, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Harma, Mehmet] Kadir Has Univ, Dept Psychol, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Harma, Mehmet] Univ Akureyri, Fac Psychol, Akureyri, Iceland; [Ymamgulyyeva, Aysoltan] 552 W Circle Dr, E Lansing, MI 48823 USAen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study aimed to investigate the actor-partner effects of attitudes toward group-based inequality as measured by social dominance orientation (SDO) and marital quality, and the indirect actor-partner effects of SDO on marital quality via ambivalent sexism and partners' perceptions of their own relationship power toward their partner. Background: Previous research suggests that certain social attitudes play a role in relationship processes. However, it is unclear whether broader views on social inequality could have an effect on partners' marital quality. Method: Ninety heterosexual married couples in Turkey (N = 180) responded via an online survey on SDO, marital quality, relationship power, and ambivalent sexism. Actorpartner interdependence model (APIM) and actor-partner interdependence model of mediation (APIMeM) were conducted to examine the direct and indirect actor-partner effects. Results: For indirect effects, men's SDO was negatively associated with their marital quality through their relationship power and hostile sexism. No significant indirect effects were found for women. However, women's relationship power was positively and their benevolent sexism was negatively associated with their own and their partners' marital quality. Conclusion: Our findings help develop a more comprehensive understanding of how the political, social, and personal aspects of our lives are connected with one another. Implications: Our study points to the importance of exploring the topic of men's and women's views toward social inequality and its effects on their close relationships in clinical practice and relational education.en_US
dc.identifier.citation2
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/fare.12881en_US
dc.identifier.issn0197-6664
dc.identifier.issn1741-3729
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85152022761en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12881
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/5611
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000965200000001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.khas20231019-WoSen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFamily Relationsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAmbivalent SexismEn_Us
dc.subjectBenevolent SexismEn_Us
dc.subjectDyadic AdjustmentEn_Us
dc.subjectMens HostileEn_Us
dc.subjectGenderEn_Us
dc.subjectOrientationEn_Us
dc.subjectSatisfactionEn_Us
dc.subjectAntecedentsEn_Us
dc.subjectPerceptionsEn_Us
dc.subjectInventoryEn_Us
dc.subjectAmbivalent Sexism
dc.subjectBenevolent Sexism
dc.subjectDyadic Adjustment
dc.subjectMens Hostile
dc.subjectGender
dc.subjectOrientation
dc.subjectdyadic analysisen_US
dc.subjectSatisfaction
dc.subjectmarital qualityen_US
dc.subjectAntecedents
dc.subjectrelationship poweren_US
dc.subjectPerceptions
dc.subjectsexismen_US
dc.subjectInventory
dc.subjectsocial dominance orientationen_US
dc.titleExamining actor-partner effects between social dominance, relationship power, sexism, and marital qualityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
5611.pdf
Size:
765.64 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Tam Metin / Full Text