Media and Democracy in Turkey: Toward a Model of Neoliberal Media Autocracy
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2012
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This paper reveals the ways in which media autocracy operates on political, judicial, economic and discursive levels in post-2007 Turkish media. Newsmakers in Turkey currently experience five different systemic kinds of neoliberal government pressures to keep their voice down: conglomerate pressure, judicial suppression, online banishment, surveillance defamation and accreditation discrimination. The progression of restrictions on media freedom has increased in volume annually since 2007; this includes pressure on the Dogan Media Group, the YouTube ban, arrests of journalists in the Ergenekon trials, phone tapping/taping of political figures and the exclusion of all unfriendly reporters from political circles. The levels and tools of this autocracy eventually lead to certain conclusions about the qualities of this media environment: it is a historically conservative, redistributive, panoptic and discriminatory media autocracy.
Description
Keywords
AKP, Censorship, Journalism, Media autocracy, Surveillance, Surveillance, Journalism, Censorship, AKP, Media autocracy
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
05 social sciences, 0506 political science
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q
Q3

OpenCitations Citation Count
78
Source
Middle East Journal Of Culture And Communication
Volume
5
Issue
3
Start Page
302
End Page
321
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 64
Scopus : 116
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 90
SCOPUS™ Citations
116
checked on Feb 07, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
92
checked on Feb 07, 2026
Page Views
6
checked on Feb 07, 2026
Google Scholar™

OpenAlex FWCI
12.38925228
Sustainable Development Goals
3
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING

7
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY

9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE

11
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES

15
LIFE ON LAND

16
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS

17
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS


