Political Polarisation on Social Media: Competing Understandings of Democracy in Turkey
Loading...
Files
Date
2022
Authors
Turkoglu, Didem
Odabas, Meltem
Tunaoglu, Doruk
Yavas, Mustafa
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd
Open Access Color
HYBRID
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Heightened political polarisation threatens democratic stability. While prior studies find polarisation in competing groups' deployment of different terminologies to describe the same topic, we emphasise that it can also be evident in groups' attachment of different meanings to the same terminology. Competition for dominance in the public sphere is reflected in social media which become sites of contestation, showcasing antagonistic claims of legitimacy. In a case-study of the June 2019 rerun Istanbul elections in Turkey, we used qualitative and computational methods to analyse approximately 116,000 tweets, focusing on discussions around the themes of 'democracy', 'elections', and 'public service'. Twitter users associated the act of casting a vote not only with electing the candidate, but also with a competition over the future of Turkish democracy.
Description
Keywords
Parties, Mobilization, Engagement, Populism, Protest, Crisis, Turkish politics, elections, Parties, 2019 Istanbul elections, Mobilization, political discourse, Engagement, Twitter, Populism, computational text analysis, Protest, hashtag analysis, Crisis, public service, Engagement, Populism, 2019 Istanbul elections, political discourse, Twitter, computational text analysis, Mobilization, Protest, Political Sociology, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Crisis, hashtag analysis, Sociology, Turkish politics, elections, Parties, public service
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
2
Source
South European Society and Politics
Volume
27
Issue
2
Start Page
223
End Page
251
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 3
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 23
SCOPUS™ Citations
3
checked on Feb 10, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
3
checked on Feb 10, 2026
Page Views
4
checked on Feb 10, 2026
Google Scholar™


