Post Occupancy Evaluation of a Transformed Design Studio

dc.contributor.author Kepez,O.
dc.contributor.author Üst,S.
dc.contributor.other Interior Architecture and Environmental Design
dc.contributor.other 06. Faculty of Art and Design
dc.contributor.other 01. Kadir Has University
dc.date.accessioned 2024-10-15T19:41:55Z
dc.date.available 2024-10-15T19:41:55Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.description.abstract The decision-makers choices regarding the design and construction of educational spaces have a direct impact on the academic culture. With regard to the design studios, the physical conditions of the studio spaces specifically act as the main element that creates the studio culture. The present study aims at understanding the relationship between the spatial transformation and the expectations of the students. Following a post occupancy approach, we asked, “What can we learn from collection of individual evaluations of students’ on transformed studio environment?” and “Where does this knowledge fit in the readily available literature on built environment and learning spaces?” Twenty-five students are asked to write texts on their expectations related to a transformed studio in which they were receiving education at the time of the study. The texts are first examined for the frequency of the words used via cloud analysis. Following that analysis, two independent evaluators identified the phenomena in the texts and conducted a content analysis. The student expectations are classified into two main groups: Learning Experiences and Spatial Experiences. Learning experience involves three subgroups namely variation in work practices, creativity and social interactions and spatial experience is made up of physical comfort and furniture subgroups. Although during the spatial transformation, some improvement have been made, they did not completely fulfill the students’ expectations. The present study proposes that in such spatial transformations, it would be possible to attain user satisfaction when decision-makers follow participatory processes in which all groups that would be effected can participate. © 2017, Istanbul Teknik Universitesi, Faculty of Architecture. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 4
dc.identifier.doi 10.5505/itujfa.2017.15807
dc.identifier.issn 2564-7474
dc.identifier.issn 1302-8324
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85144080910
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2017.15807
dc.identifier.uri https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/en/yayin/detay/312513/post-occupancy-evaluation-of-a-transformed-design-studio
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/6489
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Istanbul Teknik Universitesi, Faculty of Architecture en_US
dc.relation.ispartof A/Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Content analysis en_US
dc.subject Interior en_US
dc.subject Learning experience en_US
dc.subject Post occupancy evaluation en_US
dc.subject Studio education en_US
dc.title Post Occupancy Evaluation of a Transformed Design Studio en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.institutional Kepez, Orçun
gdc.author.scopusid 57195909512
gdc.author.scopusid 57216587106
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department Kadir Has University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp Kepez O., Interior Architecture and Environmental Design Department, Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey; Üst S., Interior Architecture and Environmental Design Department, Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 52 en_US
gdc.description.issue 3 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.startpage 41 en_US
gdc.description.volume 14 en_US
gdc.identifier.openalex W2792922696
gdc.identifier.trdizinid 312513
gdc.oaire.accesstype GOLD
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 0.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.6994262E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 2.956033E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0211 other engineering and technologies
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0601 history and archaeology
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 06 humanities and the arts
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 02 engineering and technology
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.0
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.59
gdc.opencitations.count 2
gdc.plumx.mendeley 12
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 4
gdc.scopus.citedcount 4
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 0815099a-9281-471b-b5c2-832d10ad983d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 0815099a-9281-471b-b5c2-832d10ad983d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 0a9f6edd-770d-4882-af28-4100f62c19f0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 8fe856d9-ed4d-45d5-8d18-d900eb9c3bff
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication b20623fc-1264-4244-9847-a4729ca7508c
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 0a9f6edd-770d-4882-af28-4100f62c19f0

Files