An Integrated Mcdm Approach for Evaluating the Ro-Ro Marine Port Selection Process: a Case Study in Black Sea Region

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2021

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Routledge

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

Yes

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Average
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

Selection of the appropriate Roll-on Roll-off (Ro-Ro) port is one of the crucial tasks for the maritime industry. Because there are many factors affecting the selection process, this selection process is essentially a multi-criteria decision-making problem. This paper proposes a integrated approach consisting of the CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) technique and the EDAS (Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution) method to evaluate the Ro-Ro marine ports selection. The obtained results by using the proposed model have been verified carrying out a comprehensive sensitivity analysis. In accordance with this purpose, 10 different scenarios were established and five MCDM methods were applied to make a comparison. Results obtained using the suggested model were verified in dynamic conditions. The main purpose of this implementation is to determine whether any change in the obtained results for each determined scenario. Carried out sensitivity analysis shows that the suggested hybrid MCDM model consisting of CRITIC and EDAS techniques has validity and the obtained results are accurate and realistic. When the results of the sensitivity analysis are reviewed, it can be seen that the P1 option is the best alternative for all scenarios.

Description

Keywords

N/A, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, [No Keywords]

Fields of Science

0502 economics and business, 05 social sciences

Citation

WoS Q

Scopus Q

Q3
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
15

Source

Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs

Volume

13

Issue

Start Page

203

End Page

223
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 1

Scopus : 16

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 21

SCOPUS™ Citations

16

checked on Feb 15, 2026

Page Views

4

checked on Feb 15, 2026

Downloads

95

checked on Feb 15, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
1.51382908

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available