EVALUATING LOGISTICS VILLAGES IN TURKEY USING HYBRID IMPROVED FUZZY SWARA (IMF SWARA) AND FUZZY MABAC TECHNIQUES

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2021

Authors

Hashemkhani Zolfani, Sarfaraz
Gorcun, Omer Faruk
Kucukonder, Hande

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ

Open Access Color

GOLD

Green Open Access

Yes

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 1%
Influence
Top 10%
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

Positioning in the right location for organizing logistics activities is a determinative factor in the aspect of costs, effectivity, productivity, and performance of these operations carried out by logistics firms. The proper logistics village selection is a crucial, complicated, and time-consuming process for decision-makers who have to make the right and optimal decision on this issue. Decision-makers need a methodological frame with a practical algorithm that can be implemented quickly to solve these decision-making problems. Within this scope, the current paper aims to present an evaluation tool, which provides more reasonable and reliable results for decision-makers to solve the logistics village selection problem that is very complicated and has uncertain conditions based on fuzzy approaches. In this study, we propose the Improved Fuzzy Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (IMF SWARA), a modified and extended version of the traditional fuzzy Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (F-SWARA) to identify the criteria weights. Also, we suggest applying the fuzzy Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (F-MABAC) technique to determine the preference ratings of the alternatives. This combination has many valuable contributions. For example, it proposes to use a more reliable and consistent evaluation scale based on fuzzy sets. Hence, decision-makers can perform more reliable and reasonable pairwise comparisons by considering this evaluation scale. Besides, it presents a multi-attribute evaluation system based on the identified criteria weights. From this perspective, the proposed model is implemented to evaluate eight different logistics village alternatives with respect to nine selection criteria. According to the analysis results, while A8 is the most appropriate option, C1 Gross National Product (GNP) is the most significant criterion. A comprehensive sensitivity analysis was performed to test the robustness and validation of the proposed model, and the results of the analysis approve the validity and applicability of the proposed model. As a result, the suggested integrated MCDM framework can be applied as a valuable and practical decisionmaking tool to develop new strategies and improve the logistics operations by decision-makers.

Description

Keywords

Decision-Making, Location Selection, Site Selection, Transport, Moora, Model, Ahp, Decision-Making, Location Selection, Site Selection, Transport, logistics villages, Moora, Improved Fuzzy Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (IMF SWARA), Model, Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC), Ahp, multiple criteria decision making (MCDM), multiple criteria decision making (mcdm), Decision-Making, multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (mabac), HF5001-6182, Ahp, logistics villages, Transport, Improved Fuzzy Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (IMF SWARA), Economic growth, development, planning, Moora, Location Selection, Site Selection, multiple criteria decision making (MCDM), HD72-88, Business, Finance, Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC), improved fuzzy step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (imf swara), Model, Logistics Villages, Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (Mabac), Improved Fuzzy Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (Imf Swara), Multiple Criteria Decision Making (Mcdm)

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

Fields of Science

02 engineering and technology, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering

Citation

WoS Q

Q1

Scopus Q

Q1
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
35

Source

Technological and Economic Development of Economy

Volume

27

Issue

6

Start Page

1582

End Page

1612
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 17

Scopus : 37

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 39

SCOPUS™ Citations

37

checked on Feb 01, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

33

checked on Feb 01, 2026

Page Views

6

checked on Feb 01, 2026

Downloads

377

checked on Feb 01, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
4.78489197

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available