Rethinking de facto autonomy? A multi-policy area approach and the regulatory policy processPalabras Clave(sic)(sic)(sic)
dc.authorid | Coban, Mehmet Kerem/0000-0003-3226-6340 | |
dc.authorwosid | Coban, Mehmet Kerem/N-2641-2014 | |
dc.contributor.author | Coban, M. Kerem | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-19T15:13:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-19T15:13:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.department-temp | [Coban, M. Kerem] Kadir Has Univ, Dept Polit Sci & Publ Adm, Istanbul, Turkey | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | We examine de facto autonomy across regulatory agencies and policy sectors. Yet not much is known whether, how and why de facto autonomy could vary across policy areas within the same policy sector. This article demonstrates the existence of such variation and suggests that this variation depends on the interplay between stakeholders' diverging (or overlapping) policy preferences, deficient (or superior) organizational policy capacity, and institutional arrangements leading to enabled (or constrained) de facto autonomy. Relying on elite interviews and secondary resources, this study builds on an illustrative study on bank regulation in Turkey in the post-GFC period and presents a nuanced understanding of de facto autonomy: a multi-policy area approach to de facto autonomy that allows us to examine variation in de facto autonomy across policy areas, the determinants of the variation, and whether de facto autonomy is constrained or enabled, which structures the regulatory policy process. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, NUS | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Earlier versions of this article were presented at the 5th International Conference on Public Policy and a seminar at LAGAPE, UNIL. I am grateful to participants' comments and suggestions on these occasions. I am grateful to Yannis Papadopoulos, Martino Maggetti, Emmanuelle Mathieu, Fulya Apaydin, Philipp Trein, Kutsal Yesilkagit, Yvonne Guo, Ramkishen S Rajan, Kurtulus Gemici, Razeen Sally, David Levi-Faur, Lucia Quaglia, Feng Qiushi, Michael Howlett, M. Ramesh, Kidjie Saguin, Bruno Q. Cunha, and Iftikhar Lodhi for their suggestions and comments on the earlier versions of this article. I am also grateful to three anonymous reviewers and the editors of the journal, whose insightful and stimulating observations and recommendations have improved the article substantially. Finally, as this article builds on my PhD thesis, I am grateful for NUS Research Scholarship that funded my doctoral studies at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, NUS. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | 1 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/ropr.12526 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1541-132X | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1541-1338 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85144047905 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12526 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/5615 | |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000897958400001 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q3 | |
dc.institutionauthor | Çoban, Mehmet Kerem | |
dc.khas | 20231019-WoS | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Review of Policy Research | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Organizational Autonomy | En_Us |
dc.subject | Bureaucratic Autonomy | En_Us |
dc.subject | Formal Independence | En_Us |
dc.subject | Global Diffusion | En_Us |
dc.subject | Politics | En_Us |
dc.subject | Delegation | En_Us |
dc.subject | Agencies | En_Us |
dc.subject | Finance | En_Us |
dc.subject | Design | En_Us |
dc.subject | Access | En_Us |
dc.subject | Organizational Autonomy | |
dc.subject | Bureaucratic Autonomy | |
dc.subject | Formal Independence | |
dc.subject | Global Diffusion | |
dc.subject | Politics | |
dc.subject | Delegation | |
dc.subject | de facto autonomy | en_US |
dc.subject | Agencies | |
dc.subject | institutional arrangements | en_US |
dc.subject | Finance | |
dc.subject | organizational policy capacity | en_US |
dc.subject | Design | |
dc.subject | regulatory policy process | en_US |
dc.subject | Access | |
dc.subject | stakeholder engagement | en_US |
dc.title | Rethinking de facto autonomy? A multi-policy area approach and the regulatory policy processPalabras Clave(sic)(sic)(sic) | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 5f0429ea-7083-4fbb-9508-7e2dc86fc44b | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 5f0429ea-7083-4fbb-9508-7e2dc86fc44b |