Medical Device Selection in Private Hospitals by Integrated Fuzzy Mcgdm Methods: a Case Study in Choosing Mri (magnetic Resonance Imaging) System

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2022

Authors

Kundu, Pradip
Gorcun, Omer Faruk
Kucukonder, Hande

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

Yes

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Average
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

This paper investigates medical device selection problem in healthcare organizations. As compared to numerous research works on supplier/equipment selection problems in diverse areas of applications, surprisingly, the number of works is less in case of the healthcare industry. In this paper, as a case study, we consider MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) system selection problem in private hospitals. Because of non-radiation and advanced technology, MRI has emerged as the imaging modality of choice in diagnostic and monitoring treatment. In this study, we identify 16 brands (alternatives) of MRI systems and select 10 selection criteria that are chosen with the consultation of a group of experts in the field of hospital management. Methodological framework as suggested to deal with the device selection problem includes an integrated MCGDM (multi-criteria group decision-making) approach which is a combination of fuzzy PSI (preference selection index) method and fuzzy MARCOS (measurement of alternatives and ranking according to compromise solution) method. To cope with the vagueness in linguistic evaluation done by the decision makers, fuzzy numbers have been used in the representation of linguistic terms. The integrated fuzzy MCGDM method is applied to evaluate and rank the alternatives, and the results are analyzed through a comprehensive sensitivity analysis. Total 100 scenarios are created by changing the weight of each criterion as computed using fuzzy PSI technique to examine the effects of change of the weights of the criteria on the ranking results. It is observed that out of 100 scenarios, alternative 8 (A8) remains the best option for 96 scenarios, and it is the second-best option only for the remaining 4 scenarios. Also, the results of the hybrid fuzzy MCGDM technique have been compared with the results obtained by using other MCGDM methods.

Description

Keywords

Decision-Making Method, Supplier Selection, Todim Method, Criteria, Mcdm, Decision-Making Method, Multi-criteria, Supplier Selection, group decision making, Todim Method, MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) system, Criteria, fuzzy PSI, Mcdm, fuzzy MARCOS, Marketing, Multi-criteria, fuzzy PSI, Todim Method, Decision-Making Method, Criteria, Supplier Selection, MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) system, group decision making, fuzzy MARCOS, Mcdm, Mri (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) System, Fuzzy Marcos, Group Decision Making, Multi-Criteria, Fuzzy Psi

Fields of Science

0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering

Citation

WoS Q

Q2

Scopus Q

Q1
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
13

Source

Journal of The Operational Research Society

Volume

73

Issue

9

Start Page

2059

End Page

2079
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 7

Scopus : 15

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 23

SCOPUS™ Citations

16

checked on Feb 11, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

14

checked on Feb 11, 2026

Page Views

12

checked on Feb 11, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
2.44766138

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available