Comparative Study of Active Power Curtailment Methods of Pvs for Preventing Overvoltage on Distribution Feeders

gdc.relation.journal Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM) en_US
dc.contributor.author Paudyal, Sumit
dc.contributor.author Bhattarai, Bishnu P.
dc.contributor.author Tonkoski, Reinaldo
dc.contributor.author Dahal, Sudarshan
dc.contributor.author Ceylan, Oğuzhan
dc.contributor.other Management Information Systems
dc.contributor.other 03. Faculty of Economics, Administrative and Social Sciences
dc.contributor.other 01. Kadir Has University
dc.date.accessioned 2019-06-27T08:01:09Z
dc.date.available 2019-06-27T08:01:09Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.description.abstract Overvoltage is one of the major issues on distribution grids with high penetration of photovoltaic (PV) generation. Overvoltage could be prevented through the control of active/reactive power of PVs. However given the high R/X ratio of low voltage feeders voltage control by using reactive power would not be as effective as using active power. Therefore active power curtailment (APC) of PVs though not desirable becomes necessary at times to prevent the overvoltage issues. Existing literature is rich in centralized and droop-based methods for APC and/or reactive power control of PVs to prevent overvoltage issues. In this context this paper revisits the most popular existing methods and evaluates the performance of droop-based and centralized methods using a typical North American 240 V low voltage feeder with 24 residential homes. In this work our key findings are: a) droop-based methods provided conservative solutions or did not eliminate the overvoltages completely b) power flow sensitivity based droop approach led to 13% more curtailment than the centralized approaches c) centralized approach had 40% less energy curtailed compared with standard droop while no overvoltages were observed and d) operating PVs at non-unity power factor in centralized approach led to 5% less energy curtailment. en_US]
dc.identifier.citationcount 6
dc.identifier.doi 10.1109/PESGM.2018.8585526 en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 978-1-5386-7703-2
dc.identifier.issn 1944-9925 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1944-9925
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85060810622 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/272
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1109/PESGM.2018.8585526
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher IEEE en_US
dc.relation.ispartof 2018 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM)
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Photovoltaic en_US
dc.subject Power Curtailment en_US
dc.subject Distribution Grid en_US
dc.subject Overvoltage en_US
dc.subject Inverter en_US
dc.subject Voltage Control en_US
dc.title Comparative Study of Active Power Curtailment Methods of Pvs for Preventing Overvoltage on Distribution Feeders en_US
dc.type Conference Object en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.institutional Ceylan, Oğuzhan en_US
gdc.author.institutional Ceylan, Oğuzhan
gdc.bip.impulseclass C4
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C4
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::conference output
gdc.description.department Fakülteler, İşletme Fakültesi, Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri Bölümü en_US
gdc.description.endpage 5
gdc.description.publicationcategory Konferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.startpage 1
gdc.identifier.openalex W2906209470
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000457893900001 en_US
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 5.0
gdc.oaire.influence 3.3274585E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.keywords Power Curtailment
gdc.oaire.keywords Distribution Grid
gdc.oaire.keywords Inverter
gdc.oaire.keywords Overvoltage
gdc.oaire.keywords Photovoltaic
gdc.oaire.keywords Voltage Control
gdc.oaire.popularity 9.175641E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 02 engineering and technology
gdc.openalex.fwci 1.565
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.9
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 10
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 4
gdc.plumx.mendeley 30
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 12
gdc.scopus.citedcount 12
gdc.wos.citedcount 7
relation.isAuthorOfPublication b80c3194-906c-4e78-a54c-e3cd1effc970
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery b80c3194-906c-4e78-a54c-e3cd1effc970
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication ff62e329-217b-4857-88f0-1dae00646b8c
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication acb86067-a99a-4664-b6e9-16ad10183800
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication b20623fc-1264-4244-9847-a4729ca7508c
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery ff62e329-217b-4857-88f0-1dae00646b8c

Files