Improving OpenCL programmability with the Heterogeneous Programming Library
Loading...

Date
2015
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier B.V.
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
The use of heterogeneous devices is becoming increasingly widespread. Their main drawback is their low programmability due to the large amount of details that must be handled. Another important problem is the reduced code portability, as most of the tools to program them are vendor or device-specific. The exception to this observation is OpenCL, which largely suffers from the reduced programmability problem mentioned, particularly in the host side. The Heterogeneous Programming Library (HPL) is a recent proposal to improve this situation, as it couples portability with good programmability. While the HPL kernels must be written in a language embedded in C++, users may prefer to use OpenCL kernels for several reasons such as their growing availability or a faster development from existing codes. In this paper we extend HPL to support the execution of native OpenCL kernels and we evaluate the resulting solution in terms of performance and programmability, achieving very good results. © The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Description
Elsevier Science Publishers; et al.; HPCN Foundation; Power Computing and Communication BV; Springer-Verlag; The University of Amsterdam
Keywords
Heterogeneity, Libraries, OpenCL, Portability, Programmability, OpenCL, Programmability, Libraries, Portability, Heterogeneity
Fields of Science
0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
N/A
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
8
Source
Procedia Computer Science -- International Conference on Computational Science, ICCS 2002 -- 21 April 2002 through 24 April 2002 -- Amsterdam -- 117198
Volume
51
Issue
1
Start Page
110
End Page
119
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 6
Scopus : 14
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 32
Google Scholar™


