Treatment prediction with machine learning in prostate cancer patients

dc.authoridalcin, goksel/0000-0003-2268-9606
dc.authorscopusid58782287700
dc.authorscopusid58781634100
dc.authorscopusid58781847500
dc.authorscopusid57195608308
dc.authorwosidAlataş, Emre/KFQ-7801-2024
dc.contributor.authorAlatas, Emre
dc.contributor.authorKokkulunk, Handan Tanyildizi
dc.contributor.authorTanyildizi, Hilal
dc.contributor.authorAlcin, Goksel
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-23T21:36:54Z
dc.date.available2024-06-23T21:36:54Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentKadir Has Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Alatas, Emre] Beykent Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Management Informat Syst, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Alatas, Emre] Kadir Has Univ, Inst Sci & Technol, Management Informat Syst, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Kokkulunk, Handan Tanyildizi] Altinbas Univ, Vocat Sch Hlth Serv, Radiotherapy Program, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Tanyildizi, Hilal] Beykent Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Int Trade & Finance, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Tanyildizi, Hilal] Istanbul Univ, Inst Social Sci, Business Adm, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Alcin, Goksel] Istanbul Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Istanbul, Turkiyeen_US
dc.descriptionalcin, goksel/0000-0003-2268-9606en_US
dc.description.abstractThere are various treatment modalities for prostate cancer, which has a high incidence. In this study, it is aimed to make predictions with machine learning in order to determine the optimal treatment option for prostate cancer patients. The study included 88 male patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. Independent variables were determined as Gleason scores, biopsy, PSA, SUVmax, and age. Prostate cancer treatments, which are dependent variables, were determined as hormone therapy(n = 30), radiotherapy(n = 28) and radiotherapy + hormone therapy(n = 30). Machine learning was carried out in the Python with SVM, RF, DT, ETC and XGBoost. Metrics such as accuracy, ROC curve, and AUC were used to evaluate the performance of multi-class predictions. The model with the highest number of successful predictions was the XGBoost. False negative rates for hormone therapy, radiotherapy, and radiotherapy + hormone therapy treatments were, respectively, 12.5, 33.3, and 0%. The accuracy values were computed as 0.61, 0.83, 0.83, 0.72 and 0.89 for SVM, RF, DT, ETC and XGBoost, respectively. The three features that had the greatest influence on the treatment model prediction for prostate cancer with XGBoost were biopsy, Gleason score (3 + 3), and PSA level, respectively. According to the AUC, ROC and accuracy, it was determined that the XGBoost was the model that made the best estimation of prostate cancer treatment. Among the variables biopsy, Gleason score, and PSA level are identified as key variables in prediction of treatment.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAltimath;nbascedil; University Scientific Research Funden_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNo Statement Availableen_US
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10255842.2023.2298364
dc.identifier.issn1025-5842
dc.identifier.issn1476-8259
dc.identifier.pmid38148626
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85180680427
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2023.2298364
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/5667
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001132126100001
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectProstate canceren_US
dc.subjectsupport vector machineen_US
dc.subjectrandom foresten_US
dc.subjectdecision treeen_US
dc.subjectmachine learningen_US
dc.titleTreatment prediction with machine learning in prostate cancer patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files