A Comparison Study of Fuzzy-Based Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Methods To Evaluating Green Concept Alternatives in a New Product Development Environment

dc.contributor.author Ayağ, Zeki
dc.contributor.author Ayağ, Zeki
dc.contributor.other Industrial Engineering
dc.date.accessioned 2021-05-24T16:34:59Z
dc.date.available 2021-05-24T16:34:59Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.description.abstract Purpose In this paper, the four popular multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods in fuzzy environment are utilized to reflect the vagueness and uncertainty on the judgments of decision-makers (DMs), because the crisp pairwise comparison in these conventional MCDM methods seems to be insufficient and imprecise to capture the right judgments of DMs. Of these methods, as Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP) is used to calculate criteria weights, the other methods; Fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (F-TOPSIS), Fuzzy Grey relational analysis (F-GRA) and Fuzzy Preference Ranking Organization METhod for Enrichment of Evaluations (F- PROMETHEE II) are used to rank alternatives in the three different ways for a comparative study. Design/methodology/approach The demand for green products has dramatically increased because the importance and public awareness of the preservation of natural environment was taken into consideration much more in the last two decades. As a result of this, especially manufacturing companies have been forced to design more green products, resulting in a problem of how they incorporate environmental issues into their design and evaluate concept options. The need for the practical decision-making tools to address this problem is rapidly evolving since the problem turns into an MCDM problem in the presence of a set of green concept alternatives and criteria. Findings The incorporation of fuzzy set theory into these methods is discussed on a real-life case study, and a comparative analysis is done by using its numerical results in which the three fuzzy-based methods reveal the same outcomes (or rankings), while F-GRA requires less computational steps. Moreover, more detailed analyses on the numerical results of the case study are completed on the normalization methods, distance metrics, aggregation functions, defuzzification methods and other issues. Research limitations/implications The designing and manufacturing environmental-friendly products in a product design process has been a vital issue for many companies which take care of reflecting environmental issues into their product design and meeting standards of recent green guidelines. These companies have utilized these guidelines by following special procedures at the design phase. Along the design process consisting of various steps, the environmental issues have been considered an important factor in the end-of-life of products since it can reduce the impact on the nature. In the stage of developing a new product with the aim of environmental-friendly design, the green thinking should be incorporated as early as possible in the process. Practical implications The case study was inspired from the previous work of the author, which was realized in a hot runner systems manufacturer, used in injection molding systems in a Canada. In a new product development process, the back- and front-ends of development efforts mainly determine the following criteria: cost, risk, quality and green used in this paper. The case study showed that the three fuzzy MCDM methods come to the same ranking outcomes. F-GRA has a better time complexity compared to the other two methods and uses a smaller number of computational steps. Moreover, a comparative analysis of the three F-MCDM methods; F-PROMETHEE II, F-TOPSIS and F-GRA used in ranking for green concept alternatives using the numerical results of the case study. For the case study; as seen in table 20, the three F-MCDM methods produced the numerical results on the rankings of the green concept alternatives as follows; {Concept A-Concept C-Concept B-Concept D}. Social implications Inclusion of environmental-related criteria into concept selection problem has been gaining increasing importance in the last decade. Therefore, to facilitate necessary calculations in applying each method especially with its fuzzy extension, it can be developed a knowledge-based (KB) or an expert system (ES) to help the DMs make the required calculations of each method, and interpret its results with detailed analysis. Originality/value The objective of the research was to propose a F-AHP based F-MCDM approach to green concept selection problem through F-PROMETHEE II, F-TOPSIS and F-GRA methods. As the F-AHP is used to weight evaluation criteria, the other methods are respectively used for ranking the concept alternatives and determine the best concept alternative. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 11
dc.identifier.doi 10.1108/IJICC-03-2021-0040 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1756-378X en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1756-378X
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85106023255 en_US
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q2
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/4029
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000646296700001 en_US
dc.institutionauthor Ayaǧ, Zeki en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD en_US
dc.relation.journal INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT COMPUTING AND CYBERNETICS en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 19
dc.subject New product development en_US
dc.subject Green concept selection en_US
dc.subject Multiple-criteria decision making en_US
dc.subject Fuzzy logic en_US
dc.subject AHP en_US
dc.subject TOPSIS en_US
dc.subject GRA en_US
dc.subject PROMETHEE II en_US
dc.title A Comparison Study of Fuzzy-Based Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Methods To Evaluating Green Concept Alternatives in a New Product Development Environment en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 17
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 08cbab4b-8ed5-48fe-bb67-0488cc0af5a3
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 08cbab4b-8ed5-48fe-bb67-0488cc0af5a3
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 28868d0c-e9a4-4de1-822f-c8df06d2086a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 28868d0c-e9a4-4de1-822f-c8df06d2086a

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10-1108_IJICC-03-2021-0040.pdf
Size:
348.75 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: