Used and rejected decisions in design teamwork

dc.contributor.authorEnşici, Ayhan
dc.contributor.authorBadke-Schaub, Petra
dc.contributor.authorBayazit, Nigan
dc.contributor.authorLauche, Kristina
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-27T08:03:35Z
dc.date.available2019-06-27T08:03:35Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentFakülteler, Sanat ve Tasarım Fakültesi, Endüstri Ürünleri Tasarımı Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractDecision making in design requires careful consideration as any inaccuracies or faults can have serious consequences for the producer the user and/or the competitiveness of the company. Research investigating decision making in design so far has mainly focused on the selection of decisions as part of technical choices and classical optimisation problems. In recent years further research has been started to discover the characteristics of successful decision making in industry. These later mostly single case studies shed light on some general influences on decision making but so far have not identified different relevant patterns of decision-making processes in design teams which are influential on the result and the process of decision making such as the constituents of rejected decisions. The research study reported here was initiated to further analyse the components of decision-making processes in teams with special emphasis on the question of how decisions develop during the design process. For example what happens to rejected decisions in the course of the design process? The observed processes should be analysed in detail by assessing all utterances in an interaction protocol which can be used as indicators of underlying cognitive processes in decision makingen_US]
dc.description.abstractthis research approach is usually called protocol analysis. In this experimental study using protocol analysis rejected decisions were compared against those that were chosen to be used in designing the final outcome. The findings show how the designers develop the solution space and illustrate the analysis of decisions as a promising approach to analyse both the individual cognitive process and the contribution of the individual to the decision-making process in design teams.en_US]
dc.identifier.citation10
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15710882.2013.782411en_US
dc.identifier.endpage131
dc.identifier.issn1571-0882en_US
dc.identifier.issn1571-0882
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84878654069en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage113en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/810
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2013.782411
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000319376700003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.institutionauthorEnsici, Ayhanen_US
dc.institutionauthorBayazit, Niganen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.journalCodesign-International Journal Of Cocreation In Design And The Artsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDesign processen_US
dc.subjectTeamworken_US
dc.subjectDecision makingen_US
dc.subjectProtocol analysisen_US
dc.titleUsed and rejected decisions in design teamworken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6f015f85-09ec-4173-b413-bba333dc8f6e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery6f015f85-09ec-4173-b413-bba333dc8f6e

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Used and rejected decisions in design teamwork.pdf
Size:
343.02 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: