Politics Policies Pronatalism and Practice: Availability and Accessibility of Abortion and Reproductive Health Services in Turkey
Loading...
Date
2016
Authors
MacFarlane, Katrina A.
O'Neil, Mary Lou
Tekdemir, Deniz
Cetin, Elvin
Bilgen, Baris
Foster, Angel M.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Turkey has maintained liberal contraception and abortion policies since the 1980s. In 2012 the government proposed to restrict abortion
a bill limiting abortion was later drafted but never passed into law. Since the proposed restriction women have reported difficulty accessing abortion services across Turkey. We aimed to better understand the current availability of abortion and reproductive health services in Istanbul and explore whether access to services has changed since 2012. In 2015 we completed 14 in-depth interviews with women and 11 semi-structured interviews with key informants. We transcribed all interviews and completed content and thematic analyses of the data. Key informants had good knowledge about the political discourse and the current abortion law. In contrast women were familiar with the political discourse but had mixed information about the current status of abortion and were unsure about the legality of their own abortions. There was consensus that access to services has become more limited in the last five years due to the political climate thus advocacy to prioritize reproductive health services and abortion care in particular in the public health system are needed. (C) 2016 Reproductive Health Matters. Published by Elsevier BV. All rights reserved.
a bill limiting abortion was later drafted but never passed into law. Since the proposed restriction women have reported difficulty accessing abortion services across Turkey. We aimed to better understand the current availability of abortion and reproductive health services in Istanbul and explore whether access to services has changed since 2012. In 2015 we completed 14 in-depth interviews with women and 11 semi-structured interviews with key informants. We transcribed all interviews and completed content and thematic analyses of the data. Key informants had good knowledge about the political discourse and the current abortion law. In contrast women were familiar with the political discourse but had mixed information about the current status of abortion and were unsure about the legality of their own abortions. There was consensus that access to services has become more limited in the last five years due to the political climate thus advocacy to prioritize reproductive health services and abortion care in particular in the public health system are needed. (C) 2016 Reproductive Health Matters. Published by Elsevier BV. All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Turkey, Abortion, Contraception, Middle East, North Africa, Adult, Male, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Turkey, Health Policy, Politics, Abortion, Abortion, Induced, North Africa, Health Services Accessibility, Interviews as Topic, Middle East, Family Planning Policy, Young Adult, Contraception, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Reproductive Health Services
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
19
Source
Reproductive Health Matters
Volume
24
Issue
48
Start Page
62
End Page
70
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 1
Scopus : 25
PubMed : 3
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 59
SCOPUS™ Citations
25
checked on Feb 06, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
21
checked on Feb 06, 2026
Page Views
11
checked on Feb 06, 2026
Downloads
138
checked on Feb 06, 2026
Google Scholar™

OpenAlex FWCI
0.77492839
Sustainable Development Goals
3
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING

5
GENDER EQUALITY

7
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY

9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE

11
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES

15
LIFE ON LAND

17
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS


