Skeptical Inertia in the Face of Polarization: News Consumption and Misinformation in Turkey

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2022

Authors

Bozdag, Cigdem
Kocer, Suncem

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Cogitatio Press

Open Access Color

GOLD

Green Open Access

Yes

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Top 10%
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

Focusing on Turkey, this article analyzes the role of polarization on news users' perception of misinformation and mistrust in the news on social media. Turkey is one of the countries where citizens complain most about misinformation on the internet. The citizens' trust in news institutions is also in continuous decline. Furthermore, both Turkish society and its media landscape are politically highly polarized. Focusing on Turkey's highly polarized environment, the article aims to analyze how political polarization influences the users' trust in the news and their perceptions about misinformation on social media. The study is based on multi-method research, including focus groups, media diaries, and interviews with people of different ages and socioeconomic backgrounds. The article firstly demonstrates different strategies that the users develop to validate information, including searching for any suspicious information on search engines, looking at the comments below the post, and looking at other news media, especially television. Secondly, we will discuss how more affective mechanisms of news assessment come into prominence while evaluating political news. Although our participants are self-aware and critical about their partisan attitudes in news consumption and evaluation, they also reveal media sources to which they feel politically closer. We propose the concept of skeptical inertia to refer to this self-critical yet passive position of the users in the face of the polarized news environment in Turkey.

Description

Keywords

Social Media, Fake News, Neoliberalism, Democracy, Ideology, Network, Truth, Social Media, Fake News, misinformation, Neoliberalism, news, Democracy, polarization, Ideology, skeptical inertia, Network, social media, Truth, Turkey, Turkey, social media, Neoliberalism, Network, Media Contents, Content Analysis, Türkei, Polarisierung, Desinformation, Soziale Medien, turkey, news, misinformation, Ideology, News media, journalism, publishing, Medieninhalte, Aussagenforschung, Truth, Nachrichten, polarization, Fake News, Communication. Mass media, Turkey; misinformation; news; polarization; skeptical inertia; social media, Democracy, P87-96, disinformation, Publizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesen, skeptical inertia, Social Media

Fields of Science

0508 media and communications, 05 social sciences

Citation

WoS Q

Q1

Scopus Q

Q1
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
14

Source

Media and Communication

Volume

10

Issue

2

Start Page

169

End Page

179
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 1

Scopus : 17

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 46

SCOPUS™ Citations

17

checked on Feb 09, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

15

checked on Feb 09, 2026

Page Views

8

checked on Feb 09, 2026

Downloads

201

checked on Feb 09, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
8.00748164

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available