Attractiveness Differentially Affects Direct Versus Indirect Face Evaluations in Two Cultures

dc.authoridCassidy, Brittany/0000-0002-1449-0886
dc.contributor.authorCassidy, Brittany S.
dc.contributor.authorSaribay, S. Adil
dc.contributor.authorYuksel, Huseyin
dc.contributor.authorKleisner, Karel
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-19T15:12:28Z
dc.date.available2023-10-19T15:12:28Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.department-temp[Cassidy, Brittany S.] Univ N Carolina, Greensboro, NC USA; [Saribay, S. Adil] Kadir Has Univ, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Yuksel, Huseyin] UniQus, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Kleisner, Karel] Charles Univ Prague, Prague, Czech Republic; [Cassidy, Brittany S.] Univ N Carolina, Dept Psychol, 296 Eberhart,POB 26180, Greensboro, NC 27412 USAen_US
dc.description.abstractAlthough decades of research have identified facial features relating to people's evaluations of faces, specific features have largely been examined in isolation from each other. Recent work shows that considering the relative importance of these features in face evaluations is important to test theoretical assumptions of impression formation. Here, we examined how two facial features of evolutionary interest, facial attractiveness and facial-width-to-height ratio (FWHR), relate to evaluations of faces across two cultures. Because face evaluations are typically directly measured via self-reports, we also examined whether these features exert differential effects on both direct and indirect face evaluations. Evaluations of standardized photos naturally varying in facial attractiveness and FWHR were collected using the Affect Misattribution Procedure in the United States and Turkey. When their relative contributions were considered in the same model, facial attractiveness, but not FWHR, related to face evaluations across cultures. This positive attractiveness effect was stronger for direct versus indirect evaluations across cultures. These findings highlight the importance of considering the relative contributions of facial features to evaluations across cultures and suggest a culturally invariant role of attractiveness when intentionally evaluating faces.en_US
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/14747049231186119en_US
dc.identifier.issn1474-7049
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37428141en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85164297599en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/14747049231186119
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/5456
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001023157600001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.khas20231019-WoSen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEvolutionary Psychologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectTo-Height RatioEn_Us
dc.subjectFacial AttractivenessEn_Us
dc.subjectPhysical AttractivenessEn_Us
dc.subject1st ImpressionsEn_Us
dc.subjectAffect MisattributionEn_Us
dc.subjectImplicitEn_Us
dc.subjectBeautifulEn_Us
dc.subjectGenderEn_Us
dc.subjectWidthEn_Us
dc.subjectCuesEn_Us
dc.subjectTo-Height Ratio
dc.subjectFacial Attractiveness
dc.subjectPhysical Attractiveness
dc.subject1st Impressions
dc.subjectAffect Misattribution
dc.subjectImplicit
dc.subjectfacial attractivenessen_US
dc.subjectBeautiful
dc.subjectfacial width-to-height ratioen_US
dc.subjectGender
dc.subjectface perceptionen_US
dc.subjectWidth
dc.subjectaffect misattribution procedureen_US
dc.subjectCues
dc.subjectcross-cultural effectsen_US
dc.titleAttractiveness Differentially Affects Direct Versus Indirect Face Evaluations in Two Culturesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
5456.pdf
Size:
918.08 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Tam Metin / Full Text