Universities Between Revenue and Status: a Typology of Organizational Responses

dc.authorid Topaler, Basak/0000-0002-4553-0131
dc.authorscopusid 36338123700
dc.authorscopusid 58634478400
dc.contributor.author Topaler, B.
dc.contributor.author Topaler, Ayşe Başak
dc.contributor.author Kayabaşı, A.
dc.contributor.other Business Administration
dc.date.accessioned 2024-06-23T21:38:29Z
dc.date.available 2024-06-23T21:38:29Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.department Kadir Has University en_US
dc.department-temp [Topaler B.] Faculty of Economics, Administrative, and Social Sciences, Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey; [Kayabaşı A.] Master of Business Administration, Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract Prior research on behavioral responses to performance has provided limited attention to how different types of performance outcomes interact to affect organizational reactions. Focusing on the pursuit of revenue and status goals by private universities, we offer a typology of organizational responses (i.e., reducing ambitions, compensatory strategies, and complementary use of slack to pursue new opportunities) which are shaped by the set of challenges and capabilities that poor and superior performance in these goal dimensions present. When poor performance in both revenue and status leads to different types of liabilities that together result in a low likelihood of recovery, universities respond by reducing ambitions and diversifying into a lower status market segment, which offers a more promising path to survival. In response to a mixed performance outcome in revenue and status, universities employ compensatory strategies where they make use of the achievement in one goal dimension to repair the damage in the other. Finally, universities expand the scope of activities when they achieve superior performance in both goals, and the resulting slack in revenue and status provides complementary capabilities to pursue new opportunities. These findings extend the early Carnegie proposal and indicate that the portfolio of organizational responses to performance gaps may be broader than previously considered. © 2023 European Academy of Management. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Social Science Citation Index
dc.identifier.citationcount 0
dc.identifier.doi 10.1111/emre.12612
dc.identifier.endpage 52 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1740-4754
dc.identifier.issue 1 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-105001646853
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q1
dc.identifier.startpage 38 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12612
dc.identifier.volume 22 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001077956700001
dc.identifier.wosquality Q3
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc en_US
dc.relation.ispartof European Management Review en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 0
dc.subject Higher Education en_US
dc.subject Performance Feedback Theory en_US
dc.subject Status en_US
dc.subject Universities en_US
dc.title Universities Between Revenue and Status: a Typology of Organizational Responses en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 0
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 0e6c017c-c38d-4d9b-87ca-18e7d408116d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 0e6c017c-c38d-4d9b-87ca-18e7d408116d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication c10ffc80-6da5-4b86-b481-aae660325ae5
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery c10ffc80-6da5-4b86-b481-aae660325ae5

Files