Evaluation of the European container ports using a new hybrid fuzzy LBWA-CoCoSo'B techniques

dc.authoridPamucar, Dragan/0000-0001-8522-1942
dc.authorwosidGorcun, Omer Faruk/ADF-0541-2022
dc.authorwosidPamucar, Dragan/AAG-8288-2019
dc.contributor.authorGörçün, Ömer Faruk
dc.contributor.authorGorcun, Omer Faruk
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-19T15:12:14Z
dc.date.available2023-10-19T15:12:14Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.department-temp[Pamucar, Dragan] Univ Def Belgrade, Dept Logist, Belgrade 11000, Serbia; [Gorcun, Omer Faruk] Kadir Has Univ, Dept Business Adm, Cibali Ave Kadir Has St,Fatih, TR-34083 Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractReducing transportation costs is one of today's global supply chains' essential tasks. For this purpose, as the crucial players of the worldwide supply chains, the international container shipping companies try to find optimal ways to reduce the shipping costs. Unnecessary transhipment and displacement operations are the leading causes of high logistics and transport costs. Selecting the most appropriate container seaport is one of the most effective ways to minimize these costs. The proper container port choice can provide an optimum container shipping system consisting of productive, efficient, and less costly container lines. Besides, a methodological framework is needed to address these kinds of highly complex decision-making issues. To serve this purpose, this paper proposes a fuzzy integrated MCDM approach consisting of the Fuzzy LBWA and fuzzy CoCoSo'B techniques. The consistency and stability of the model applied to evaluate the European container ports have been approved by a comprehensive sensitivity analysis. When the obtained results are evaluated, While C5 Port Costs has been determined as the most influential criterion, A2 Port of Antwerp (2.034) is the best and A10 Port of Barcelona (1.266) is the worst alternative. The obtained results were validated by comparing the results of the implemented popular MCDM frameworks with the help of Spearman Correlation Coefficient (SCC) [(SCC (MABAC) = 1.00; SCC (MAIRCA) = 1.00 and SCC (CoCoSo) = 0.915]. All SCC values have over 0.80 that can be accepted high correlation coefficient. The analysis results prove that the proposed fuzzy technique can be implemented to solve the highly complex decision-making problems faced in the maritime industry.en_US
dc.identifier.citation24
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117463en_US
dc.identifier.issn0957-4174
dc.identifier.issn1873-6793
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85130829287en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117463
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/5383
dc.identifier.volume203en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000830886800007en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.khas20231019-WoSen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon-Elsevier Science Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofExpert Systems With Applicationsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDecision-Making ModelEn_Us
dc.subjectMcdm ApproachEn_Us
dc.subjectEfficiencyEn_Us
dc.subjectSelectionEn_Us
dc.subjectCompetitivenessEn_Us
dc.subjectPrivatizationEn_Us
dc.subjectCriteriaEn_Us
dc.subjectDecision-Making Model
dc.subjectMcdm Approach
dc.subjectEfficiency
dc.subjectFuzzy logicen_US
dc.subjectSelection
dc.subjectContainer port selectionen_US
dc.subjectCompetitiveness
dc.subjectLBWAen_US
dc.subjectPrivatization
dc.subjectCoCoSoen_US
dc.subjectCriteria
dc.subjectBonferronien_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the European container ports using a new hybrid fuzzy LBWA-CoCoSo'B techniquesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication4d0f6004-dbe4-4e79-befd-457af3bb133f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery4d0f6004-dbe4-4e79-befd-457af3bb133f

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
5383.pdf
Size:
886.16 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Tam Metin / Full Text