Measuring, Evaluating and Improving Hospital Quality Parameters/Dimensions - an Integrated Healthcare Quality Approach

gdc.relation.journal International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance en_US
dc.contributor.author Zineldin, Mosad
dc.contributor.author Akdag, Hatice Camgöz
dc.contributor.author Vasicheva, Valentina
dc.date.accessioned 2021-02-16T19:38:51Z
dc.date.available 2021-02-16T19:38:51Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.description.abstract Purpose: This paper aims to examine the major factors affecting cumulative summation, to empirically examine the major factors affecting satisfaction and to address the question whether patients in Kazakhstan evaluate healthcare similarly or differently from patients in Egypt and Jordan. Design/methodology/approach: A questionnaire, adapted from previous research, was distributed to Kazakhstan inpatients. The questionnaire contained 39 attributes about five newly-developed quality dimensions (5Qs), which were identified to be the most relevant attributes for hospitals. The questionnaire was translated into Russian to increase the response rate and improve data quality. Almost 200 usable questionnaires were returned. Frequency distribution, factor analysis and reliability checks were used to analyze the data. Findings: The three biggest concerns for Kazakhstan patients are: infrastructure; atmosphere; and interaction. Hospital staff's concern for patients' needs, parking facilities for visitors, waiting time and food temperature were all common specific attributes, which were perceived as concerns. These were shortcomings in all three countries. Improving health service quality by applying total relationship management and the 5Qs model together with a customer-orientation strategy is recommended. Practical implications: Results can be used by hospital staff to reengineer and redesign creatively their quality management processes and help move towards more effective healthcare quality strategies. Social implications: Patients in three countries have similar concerns and quality perceptions. Originality/value: The paper describes a new instrument and method. The study assures relevance, validity and reliability, while being explicitly change-oriented. The authors argue that patient satisfaction is a cumulative construct, summing satisfaction as five different qualities (5Qs): object; processes; infrastructure; interaction and atmosphere. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 17
dc.identifier.doi 10.1108/09526861111174215 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0952-6862 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0952-6862
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-80054023817 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/3938
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.ispartof International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Customer satisfaction en_US
dc.subject Customer services quality en_US
dc.subject Egypt en_US
dc.subject Healthcare en_US
dc.subject Jordan en_US
dc.subject Kazakhstan en_US
dc.subject Patient-staff relationship en_US
dc.subject Patients en_US
dc.subject Quality management en_US
dc.title Measuring, Evaluating and Improving Hospital Quality Parameters/Dimensions - an Integrated Healthcare Quality Approach en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.institutional Akdag, Hatice Camgöz en_US
gdc.bip.impulseclass C4
gdc.bip.influenceclass C4
gdc.bip.popularityclass C4
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.endpage 662 en_US
gdc.description.issue 8 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q3
gdc.description.startpage 654 en_US
gdc.description.volume 24 en_US
gdc.identifier.openalex W2055042155
gdc.identifier.pmid 22204269 en_US
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000212538600025 en_US
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 6.0
gdc.oaire.influence 4.7257958E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.keywords Jordan
gdc.oaire.keywords Patients
gdc.oaire.keywords Quality Assurance, Health Care
gdc.oaire.keywords Waiting Lists
gdc.oaire.keywords Customer satisfaction
gdc.oaire.keywords Healthcare
gdc.oaire.keywords Process Assessment, Health Care
gdc.oaire.keywords Customer services quality
gdc.oaire.keywords Patient-staff relationship
gdc.oaire.keywords Professional-Patient Relations
gdc.oaire.keywords Environment
gdc.oaire.keywords Kazakhstan
gdc.oaire.keywords Hospital Administration
gdc.oaire.keywords Patient Satisfaction
gdc.oaire.keywords Humans
gdc.oaire.keywords Egypt
gdc.oaire.keywords Quality management
gdc.oaire.keywords Quality Indicators, Health Care
gdc.oaire.keywords Quality of Health Care
gdc.oaire.popularity 1.0715335E-8
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 03 medical and health sciences
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0302 clinical medicine
gdc.openalex.fwci 3.627
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.98
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 27
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 26
gdc.plumx.mendeley 135
gdc.plumx.pubmedcites 5
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 24
gdc.scopus.citedcount 24
gdc.wos.citedcount 19
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication b20623fc-1264-4244-9847-a4729ca7508c
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery b20623fc-1264-4244-9847-a4729ca7508c

Files