Measuring, Evaluating and Improving Hospital Quality Parameters/Dimensions - an Integrated Healthcare Quality Approach

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2011

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Top 10%
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to examine the major factors affecting cumulative summation, to empirically examine the major factors affecting satisfaction and to address the question whether patients in Kazakhstan evaluate healthcare similarly or differently from patients in Egypt and Jordan. Design/methodology/approach: A questionnaire, adapted from previous research, was distributed to Kazakhstan inpatients. The questionnaire contained 39 attributes about five newly-developed quality dimensions (5Qs), which were identified to be the most relevant attributes for hospitals. The questionnaire was translated into Russian to increase the response rate and improve data quality. Almost 200 usable questionnaires were returned. Frequency distribution, factor analysis and reliability checks were used to analyze the data. Findings: The three biggest concerns for Kazakhstan patients are: infrastructure; atmosphere; and interaction. Hospital staff's concern for patients' needs, parking facilities for visitors, waiting time and food temperature were all common specific attributes, which were perceived as concerns. These were shortcomings in all three countries. Improving health service quality by applying total relationship management and the 5Qs model together with a customer-orientation strategy is recommended. Practical implications: Results can be used by hospital staff to reengineer and redesign creatively their quality management processes and help move towards more effective healthcare quality strategies. Social implications: Patients in three countries have similar concerns and quality perceptions. Originality/value: The paper describes a new instrument and method. The study assures relevance, validity and reliability, while being explicitly change-oriented. The authors argue that patient satisfaction is a cumulative construct, summing satisfaction as five different qualities (5Qs): object; processes; infrastructure; interaction and atmosphere.

Description

Keywords

Customer satisfaction, Customer services quality, Egypt, Healthcare, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Patient-staff relationship, Patients, Quality management, Jordan, Patients, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Waiting Lists, Customer satisfaction, Healthcare, Process Assessment, Health Care, Customer services quality, Patient-staff relationship, Professional-Patient Relations, Environment, Kazakhstan, Hospital Administration, Patient Satisfaction, Humans, Egypt, Quality management, Quality Indicators, Health Care, Quality of Health Care

Fields of Science

03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine

Citation

WoS Q

Q2

Scopus Q

Q3
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
28

Source

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance

Volume

24

Issue

8

Start Page

654

End Page

662
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 26

Scopus : 23

PubMed : 5

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 135

SCOPUS™ Citations

24

checked on Feb 14, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

19

checked on Feb 14, 2026

Page Views

9

checked on Feb 14, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
3.9347761

Sustainable Development Goals

17

PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS Logo