Multimodal language in child-directed versus adult-directed speech

dc.authorscopusid57730179200
dc.authorscopusid57209003778
dc.authorscopusid56033129600
dc.contributor.authorÖzer, Demet
dc.contributor.authorÖzer,D.
dc.contributor.authorAktan-Erciyes,A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-15T19:42:44Z
dc.date.available2024-10-15T19:42:44Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentKadir Has Universityen_US
dc.department-tempKandemir S., Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey; Özer D., Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey; Aktan-Erciyes A., Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractSpeakers design their multimodal communication according to the needs and knowledge of their interlocutors, phenomenon known as audience design. We use more sophisticated language (e.g., longer sentences with complex grammatical forms) when communicating with adults compared with children. This study investigates how speech and co-speech gestures change in adult-directed speech (ADS) versus child-directed speech (CDS) for three different tasks. Overall, 66 adult participants (Mage = 21.05, 60 female) completed three different tasks (story-reading, storytelling and address description) and they were instructed to pretend to communicate with a child (CDS) or an adult (ADS). We hypothesised that participants would use more complex language, more beat gestures, and less iconic gestures in the ADS compared with the CDS. Results showed that, for CDS, participants used more iconic gestures in the story-reading task and storytelling task compared with ADS. However, participants used more beat gestures in the storytelling task for ADS than CDS. In addition, language complexity did not differ across conditions. Our findings indicate that how speakers employ different types of gestures (iconic vs beat) according to the addressee’s needs and across different tasks. Speakers might prefer to use more iconic gestures with children than adults. Results are discussed according to audience design theory. © Experimental Psychology Society 2023.en_US
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/17470218231188832
dc.identifier.endpage728en_US
dc.identifier.issn1747-0218
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37417537
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85175102591
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage716en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/17470218231188832
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/6583
dc.identifier.volume77en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectadult-directed speechen_US
dc.subjectAudience designen_US
dc.subjectchild-directed speechen_US
dc.subjectmultimodal languageen_US
dc.titleMultimodal language in child-directed versus adult-directed speechen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication48189ebf-67ef-4e36-aac8-9fe249598954
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery48189ebf-67ef-4e36-aac8-9fe249598954

Files