Multimodal Language in Child-Directed Versus Adult-Directed Speech

dc.authorscopusid 57730179200
dc.authorscopusid 57209003778
dc.authorscopusid 56033129600
dc.contributor.author Kandemir,S.
dc.contributor.author Özer, Demet
dc.contributor.author Özer,D.
dc.contributor.author Aktan-Erciyes,A.
dc.contributor.other Psychology
dc.date.accessioned 2024-10-15T19:42:44Z
dc.date.available 2024-10-15T19:42:44Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.department Kadir Has University en_US
dc.department-temp Kandemir S., Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey; Özer D., Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey; Aktan-Erciyes A., Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract Speakers design their multimodal communication according to the needs and knowledge of their interlocutors, phenomenon known as audience design. We use more sophisticated language (e.g., longer sentences with complex grammatical forms) when communicating with adults compared with children. This study investigates how speech and co-speech gestures change in adult-directed speech (ADS) versus child-directed speech (CDS) for three different tasks. Overall, 66 adult participants (Mage = 21.05, 60 female) completed three different tasks (story-reading, storytelling and address description) and they were instructed to pretend to communicate with a child (CDS) or an adult (ADS). We hypothesised that participants would use more complex language, more beat gestures, and less iconic gestures in the ADS compared with the CDS. Results showed that, for CDS, participants used more iconic gestures in the story-reading task and storytelling task compared with ADS. However, participants used more beat gestures in the storytelling task for ADS than CDS. In addition, language complexity did not differ across conditions. Our findings indicate that how speakers employ different types of gestures (iconic vs beat) according to the addressee’s needs and across different tasks. Speakers might prefer to use more iconic gestures with children than adults. Results are discussed according to audience design theory. © Experimental Psychology Society 2023. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 0
dc.identifier.doi 10.1177/17470218231188832
dc.identifier.endpage 728 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1747-0218
dc.identifier.issue 4 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 37417537
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85175102591
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q3
dc.identifier.startpage 716 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218231188832
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/6583
dc.identifier.volume 77 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality Q3
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher SAGE Publications Ltd en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 2
dc.subject adult-directed speech en_US
dc.subject Audience design en_US
dc.subject child-directed speech en_US
dc.subject multimodal language en_US
dc.title Multimodal Language in Child-Directed Versus Adult-Directed Speech en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 48189ebf-67ef-4e36-aac8-9fe249598954
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 48189ebf-67ef-4e36-aac8-9fe249598954
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 9390486a-b1dc-46cf-ad5f-31415f0c8b95
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9390486a-b1dc-46cf-ad5f-31415f0c8b95

Files