Concept selection with hesitant fuzzy ANP-PROMETHEE II

dc.authoridDr. Zeki Ayağ, P.Eng./0000-0003-4078-2804
dc.authoridAyağ, Zeki/0000-0003-4078-2804
dc.authorwosidDr. Zeki Ayağ, P.Eng./E-9143-2013
dc.authorwosidAyağ, Zeki/IWD-9525-2023
dc.contributor.authorSamanlıoğlu, Funda
dc.contributor.authorAyag, Zeki
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-19T15:12:52Z
dc.date.available2023-10-19T15:12:52Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.department-temp[Samanlioglu, Funda; Ayag, Zeki] Kadir Has Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34083 Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractAn integrated approach is given for the assessment and ranking of concepts as part of the new product development (NPD) process. Selection of the best concept in NPD involves multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) since there are numerous possibly competing criteria to consider. Here, hesitant fuzzy Analytic Network Process (H-F-ANP) and hesitant fuzzy Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enriching Evaluations II (H-F-PROMETHEE II) are integrated to assess the concepts and determine the best. In the hesitant fuzzy ANP-PROMETHEE II (H-F-ANP-PROMETHEE II), H-F-ANP is applied to calculate criteria weights, taking into consideration inner and outer dependence and feedback interactions between criteria and H-F-PROMETHEE II is implemented to rank concept alternatives, employing the calculated criteria weights. A demonstrative example is given where five concepts are evaluated by three decision makers (DMs) to exhibit the applicability. For comparison, H-F-ANP-VIKOR is utilized.en_US
dc.identifier.citation17
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/21681015.2021.1944918en_US
dc.identifier.endpage560en_US
dc.identifier.issn2168-1015
dc.identifier.issn2168-1023
dc.identifier.issn2168-1015
dc.identifier.issn2168-1023
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85111595597en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage547en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2021.1944918
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/5552
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000678356500001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.khas20231019-WoSen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Industrial and Production Engineeringen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectGroup Decision-MakingEn_Us
dc.subjectProgramming MethodEn_Us
dc.subjectVikorEn_Us
dc.subjectSetsEn_Us
dc.subjectDesignEn_Us
dc.subjectAhpEn_Us
dc.subjectMethodologyEn_Us
dc.subjectDematelEn_Us
dc.subjectTopsisEn_Us
dc.subjectGroup Decision-Making
dc.subjectProgramming Method
dc.subjectVikor
dc.subjectSets
dc.subjectDesign
dc.subjectConcept selectionen_US
dc.subjectAhp
dc.subjectMCDMen_US
dc.subjectMethodology
dc.subjecthesitant fuzzyen_US
dc.subjectDematel
dc.subjectANPen_US
dc.subjectTopsis
dc.subjectPROMETHEE IIen_US
dc.titleConcept selection with hesitant fuzzy ANP-PROMETHEE IIen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication4e74c274-0592-4792-ac57-00061bd273aa
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery4e74c274-0592-4792-ac57-00061bd273aa

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
5552.pdf
Size:
1.27 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Tam Metin / Full Text