Ülkebaş, Selen Devrim

Profile Picture
Name Variants
Ülkebaş, Selen Devrim
S.,Ülkebaş
S. D. Ülkebaş
Selen Devrim, Ülkebaş
Ulkebas, Selen Devrim
S.,Ulkebas
S. D. Ulkebas
Selen Devrim, Ulkebas
Job Title
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi
Email Address
Selen.ulkebas@khas.edu.tr
ORCID ID
Scopus Author ID
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID
Scholarly Output

3

Articles

1

Citation Count

0

Supervised Theses

0

Filters

2017 - 20183
Reset filters

Settings

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Conference Object
    Citation Count: 1
    Students’ Product Perception: a Cross-Sectional Analysis
    (Institution of Engineering Designers The Design Society, 2018) Oygur, Isil; Ülkebaş, Selen Devrim
    This paper reports a study that was conducted to analyze the differences in product design students’ perception of products. While product perception is reported as one of the competencies of product design students our knowledge on the development of this competence via design education is limited. In order to address this gap students studying at different levels of design education at a 4-year product design programme were asked to participate in a keyword assignment study. Students were distributed a pen to analyze and asked to assign keywords that they associate to this product. The analysis of the keyword preferences across years indicates an increase in the use of keywords related to instrumental function of products. While students prefer using fact/description based keywords in the early years of design education they rely more on opinion-based keywords in the later years. Most of these opinion-based keywords are associated with the instrumental dimension. Thus the data from this case indicates more focus on instrumentality in the contemporary product design education. © 2018 Institution of Engineering Designers The Design Society. All Rights Reserved.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation Count: 0
    Facebook as a Boundary Object in Industrial Design Studio. a Sotl Study
    (Routledge Journals Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2017) Oygür, Işıl; Ülkebaş, Selen Devrim
    We introduced Facebook groups as instructional tools in our industrial design studio courses. One of us experienced the effects of Facebook on freshmen while the other examined it with sophomores and juniors. Our analysis of the data focused on the content of students' posts on Facebook groups informal student interviews our experiences in studios and our reflective cross-evaluation. Our comparative analysis showed that Facebook better serves as a boundary object in the later years of design education. The freshmen and partly sophomore were not able to make effective use of this medium for exchanging knowledge. From the perspective of SoTL this study not only helped us to experiment ways of advancing our pedagogy but also served as a platform for us to discuss and exchange knowledge on teaching and learning that is taking place in studio.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book Part
    Citation Count: 0
    Creative Problem-Solving Assessment and Product Design Education
    (Institution of Engineering Designers, The Design Society, 2018) DiMli Oraklibel, Renk; Ülkebaş, Selen Devrim; Oygur, Isil
    This study reports findings from the administration of Creative Engineering Design Assessment (CEDA) to product design. The aim is to assess the applicability of CEDA in this discipline for the analysis of students’ level of creative problem-solving (CPS) abilities throughout the years of product design education. CEDA measures CPS in four dimensions; i.e., originality, usefulness, flexibility and fluency. 225 students studying at three universities from Istanbul, Turkey completed CEDA on a voluntary basis. The analysis of the data indicates statistically significant differences between 3rd and 4th (on originality), 1st and 3rd (on usefulness), 2nd and 4th (on originality and usefulness), and 1st and 4th (on all dimensions) year students’ CEDA scores. Originality aspect of creativity seems to develop more as the students get into their final year, whereas the usefulness develops starting from the second year. While CEDA was useful as a tool to discuss our studio pedagogies, our experience in applying it in the context of product design illustrates the need to revise the instrument according to the nature of this discipline.