Multimodal Language in Child-Directed Versus Adult-Directed Speech

dc.authorid Ozer, Demet/0000-0003-3230-2874
dc.authorid AKTAN-ERCIYES, ASLI/0000-0002-6531-6140
dc.contributor.author Kandemir, Songul
dc.contributor.author Özer, Demet
dc.contributor.author Ozer, Demet
dc.contributor.author Aktan-Erciyes, Asli
dc.contributor.other Psychology
dc.date.accessioned 2023-10-19T15:12:31Z
dc.date.available 2023-10-19T15:12:31Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.department-temp [Kandemir, Songul; Ozer, Demet; Aktan-Erciyes, Asli] Kadir Has Univ, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Aktan-Erciyes, Asli] Kadir Has Univ, TR-34083 Istanbul, Turkiye en_US
dc.description.abstract Speakers design their multimodal communication according to the needs and knowledge of their interlocutors, phenomenon known as audience design. We use more sophisticated language (e.g., longer sentences with complex grammatical forms) when communicating with adults compared with children. This study investigates how speech and co-speech gestures change in adult-directed speech (ADS) versus child-directed speech (CDS) for three different tasks. Overall, 66 adult participants (M-age = 21.05, 60 female) completed three different tasks (story-reading, storytelling and address description) and they were instructed to pretend to communicate with a child (CDS) or an adult (ADS). We hypothesised that participants would use more complex language, more beat gestures, and less iconic gestures in the ADS compared with the CDS. Results showed that, for CDS, participants used more iconic gestures in the story-reading task and storytelling task compared with ADS. However, participants used more beat gestures in the storytelling task for ADS than CDS. In addition, language complexity did not differ across conditions. Our findings indicate that how speakers employ different types of gestures (iconic vs beat) according to the addressee's needs and across different tasks. Speakers might prefer to use more iconic gestures with children than adults. Results are discussed according to audience design theory. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 0
dc.identifier.doi 10.1177/17470218231188832 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1747-0218
dc.identifier.issn 1747-0226
dc.identifier.pmid 37417537 en_US
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q2
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218231188832
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/5468
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001039291500001 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality Q3
dc.khas 20231019-WoS en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Sage Publications Ltd en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Conversational Hand Gestures En_Us
dc.subject Recipient Design En_Us
dc.subject Older-Adults En_Us
dc.subject Communication En_Us
dc.subject Motherese En_Us
dc.subject Speakers En_Us
dc.subject Recall En_Us
dc.subject Preference En_Us
dc.subject Speaking En_Us
dc.subject Younger En_Us
dc.subject Conversational Hand Gestures
dc.subject Recipient Design
dc.subject Older-Adults
dc.subject Communication
dc.subject Motherese
dc.subject Speakers
dc.subject Recall
dc.subject Audience design en_US
dc.subject Preference
dc.subject multimodal language en_US
dc.subject Speaking
dc.subject adult-directed speech en_US
dc.subject Younger
dc.subject child-directed speech en_US
dc.title Multimodal Language in Child-Directed Versus Adult-Directed Speech en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 3
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 48189ebf-67ef-4e36-aac8-9fe249598954
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 48189ebf-67ef-4e36-aac8-9fe249598954
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 9390486a-b1dc-46cf-ad5f-31415f0c8b95
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9390486a-b1dc-46cf-ad5f-31415f0c8b95

Files