Population politics, reproductive governance and access to abortion in Turkey

dc.authorscopusid57192942690
dc.authorscopusid58918214900
dc.authorscopusid57203023692
dc.contributor.authorO'Neil, Mary Lou
dc.contributor.authorRamaswamy, Amrutha
dc.contributor.authorAltuntas, Deniz
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-23T21:38:10Z
dc.date.available2024-06-23T21:38:10Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentKadir Has Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[O'Neil, Mary Lou] Kadir Has Univ, Dept Polit Sci & Publ Adm, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Ramaswamy, Amrutha] Univ Calif Berkeley, Publ Policy Dept, Berkeley, CA USA; [Altuntas, Deniz] Kadir Has Univ, Women & Family Studies Res Ctr, Istanbul, Turkiyeen_US
dc.description.abstractTurkey currently pursues an aggressive pronatalist population politics which has created wide-reaching reproductive governance regulating reproductive health care and family planning choices. One aspect of this orientation centres on restricting access to abortion services despite the fact that abortion is legal through ten weeks of pregnancy. This article uses nationwide data collected from mystery patient surveys administered to all public (in 2016 and 2020), and all private (2021) hospitals in the country to determine the availability of abortion services in Turkey. Less than half of all hospitals responding provided abortions to the full extent provided by law. Abortion without restriction as to reason was largely unavailable at public hospitals and the cost of care at private hospitals remained prohibitive for many. Among those hospitals we reached, in four provinces, there was no public or private hospital providing any type of abortion care. The most frequent explanation for the lack of abortion services was that abortion is illegal. This was particularly the case for public hospitals. Despite a 10-week cutoff for abortions, 39% of private hospitals responding to the survey invoked even earlier time limits creating further restrictions. The extreme pronatal orientation of the reproductive governance currently in place has created a state of reproductive injustice that makes enhanced access to abortion of vital importance.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipGenderEx: Gender for Excellence in Research project - European Union [952432]; Fullbright Research Granten_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported in part by the GenderEx: Gender for Excellence in Research project funded by the European Union under Grant 952432. Amrutha Ramaswamy was supported by a Fullbright Research Grant during her time on the project.en_US
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13691058.2024.2317734
dc.identifier.issn1369-1058
dc.identifier.issn1464-5351
dc.identifier.pmid38402596
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85186604936
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2024.2317734
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/5762
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001172859100001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectabortionen_US
dc.subjectaccessen_US
dc.subjectTurkeyen_US
dc.subjectreproductive governanceen_US
dc.titlePopulation politics, reproductive governance and access to abortion in Turkeyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files