Population Politics, Reproductive Governance and Access To Abortion in Turkey

dc.authorscopusid 57192942690
dc.authorscopusid 58918214900
dc.authorscopusid 57203023692
dc.contributor.author O'Neil, Mary Lou
dc.contributor.author Louıse Şimşek, Mary
dc.contributor.author Ramaswamy, Amrutha
dc.contributor.author Altuntas, Deniz
dc.contributor.other Political Science and International Relations
dc.date.accessioned 2024-06-23T21:38:10Z
dc.date.available 2024-06-23T21:38:10Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.department Kadir Has University en_US
dc.department-temp [O'Neil, Mary Lou] Kadir Has Univ, Dept Polit Sci & Publ Adm, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Ramaswamy, Amrutha] Univ Calif Berkeley, Publ Policy Dept, Berkeley, CA USA; [Altuntas, Deniz] Kadir Has Univ, Women & Family Studies Res Ctr, Istanbul, Turkiye en_US
dc.description.abstract Turkey currently pursues an aggressive pronatalist population politics which has created wide-reaching reproductive governance regulating reproductive health care and family planning choices. One aspect of this orientation centres on restricting access to abortion services despite the fact that abortion is legal through ten weeks of pregnancy. This article uses nationwide data collected from mystery patient surveys administered to all public (in 2016 and 2020), and all private (2021) hospitals in the country to determine the availability of abortion services in Turkey. Less than half of all hospitals responding provided abortions to the full extent provided by law. Abortion without restriction as to reason was largely unavailable at public hospitals and the cost of care at private hospitals remained prohibitive for many. Among those hospitals we reached, in four provinces, there was no public or private hospital providing any type of abortion care. The most frequent explanation for the lack of abortion services was that abortion is illegal. This was particularly the case for public hospitals. Despite a 10-week cutoff for abortions, 39% of private hospitals responding to the survey invoked even earlier time limits creating further restrictions. The extreme pronatal orientation of the reproductive governance currently in place has created a state of reproductive injustice that makes enhanced access to abortion of vital importance. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship GenderEx: Gender for Excellence in Research project - European Union [952432]; Fullbright Research Grant en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This work was supported in part by the GenderEx: Gender for Excellence in Research project funded by the European Union under Grant 952432. Amrutha Ramaswamy was supported by a Fullbright Research Grant during her time on the project. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 0
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/13691058.2024.2317734
dc.identifier.issn 1369-1058
dc.identifier.issn 1464-5351
dc.identifier.pmid 38402596
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85186604936
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q2
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2024.2317734
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/5762
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001172859100001
dc.identifier.wosquality Q1
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 2
dc.subject abortion en_US
dc.subject access en_US
dc.subject Turkey en_US
dc.subject reproductive governance en_US
dc.title Population Politics, Reproductive Governance and Access To Abortion in Turkey en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 2
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication fed19e9a-e456-47c9-bb1b-cb1ffbdd04ef
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery fed19e9a-e456-47c9-bb1b-cb1ffbdd04ef
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication a14c56b3-75bd-423c-b4e9-5aea12f8bbfd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery a14c56b3-75bd-423c-b4e9-5aea12f8bbfd

Files