Population Politics, Reproductive Governance and Access To Abortion in Turkey
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2024
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Turkey currently pursues an aggressive pronatalist population politics which has created wide-reaching reproductive governance regulating reproductive health care and family planning choices. One aspect of this orientation centres on restricting access to abortion services despite the fact that abortion is legal through ten weeks of pregnancy. This article uses nationwide data collected from mystery patient surveys administered to all public (in 2016 and 2020), and all private (2021) hospitals in the country to determine the availability of abortion services in Turkey. Less than half of all hospitals responding provided abortions to the full extent provided by law. Abortion without restriction as to reason was largely unavailable at public hospitals and the cost of care at private hospitals remained prohibitive for many. Among those hospitals we reached, in four provinces, there was no public or private hospital providing any type of abortion care. The most frequent explanation for the lack of abortion services was that abortion is illegal. This was particularly the case for public hospitals. Despite a 10-week cutoff for abortions, 39% of private hospitals responding to the survey invoked even earlier time limits creating further restrictions. The extreme pronatal orientation of the reproductive governance currently in place has created a state of reproductive injustice that makes enhanced access to abortion of vital importance.
Description
Keywords
abortion, access, Turkey, reproductive governance, Turkey, Pregnancy, Hospitals, Public, Family Planning Services, Surveys and Questionnaires, Politics, Humans, Female, Abortion, Induced, Reproductive Health Services, Health Services Accessibility, Hospitals, Private
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
1
Source
Culture, Health & Sexuality
Volume
26
Issue
Start Page
1316
End Page
1332
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 2
Scopus : 5
PubMed : 1
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 13
SCOPUS™ Citations
5
checked on Feb 05, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
6
checked on Feb 05, 2026
Page Views
3
checked on Feb 05, 2026
Google Scholar™

OpenAlex FWCI
10.81292021
Sustainable Development Goals
3
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING

5
GENDER EQUALITY

8
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH

9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE

10
REDUCED INEQUALITIES


