Reflective Thinking Predicts Disbelief in God Across 19 Countries

dc.authoridRoss, Robert/0000-0001-8711-1675
dc.authoridGhasemi, Omidreza/0000-0001-7511-5580
dc.authorscopusid57220761172
dc.authorscopusid56498563100
dc.authorscopusid57200182087
dc.authorscopusid57207454819
dc.authorscopusid23567212800
dc.authorwosidRoss, Robert/Abr-5640-2022
dc.contributor.authorGhasemi, Omid
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Onurcan
dc.contributor.authorIsler, Ozan
dc.contributor.authorTerry, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorRoss, Robert M.
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-15T18:39:29Z
dc.date.available2025-05-15T18:39:29Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentKadir Has Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Ghasemi, Omid] Univ New South Wales, Inst Climate Risk & Response, Sydney, Australia; [Yilmaz, Onurcan] Kadir Has Univ, Dept Psychol, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Isler, Ozan] Univ Queensland, Sch Econ, Brisbane, Australia; [Terry, Jenny] Univ Sussex, Sch Psychol, Brighton, England; [Ross, Robert M.] Macquarie Univ, Dept Philosophy, Sydney, Australiaen_US
dc.descriptionRoss, Robert/0000-0001-8711-1675; Ghasemi, Omidreza/0000-0001-7511-5580en_US
dc.description.abstractIn the present study, we tested three hypotheses about relationships between reflective thinking, intuitive thinking (both measured using the Cognitive Reflection Test; CRT), and belief in God or gods (BiG) in university students across 19 culturally and geographically diverse countries (n = 7,771). In support of our first hypothesis, we found a negative relationship between reflective thinking and BiG; and in support of our second hypothesis, we found a positive relationship between intuitive thinking and BiG. Contrary to our third hypothesis, we found no evidence that measuring CRT prior to measuring BiG decreased BiG. Given that this is the first large cross-cultural test of these hypotheses to have a preregistered analysis plan, the first to hold education constant across countries, and the first to use both Bayesian and frequentist methods, these results considerably bolster the evidence in support of the first two hypotheses and against the third hypothesis.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCAUL; John Templeton Foundation [62631]; Templeton Religion Trust [TRT0424]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions. This work was supported by the John Templeton Foundation [Grant ID: 62631] and Templeton Religion Trust [Grant ID: TRT0424].en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexSocial Science Citation Index
dc.identifier.doi10.3758/s13423-025-02691-9
dc.identifier.issn1069-9384
dc.identifier.issn1531-5320
dc.identifier.pmid40274723
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105003386616
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02691-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/7323
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001478549400001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBelief In Goden_US
dc.subjectCognitive Reflection Testen_US
dc.subjectIntuitionen_US
dc.subjectPrimeen_US
dc.subjectReflectionen_US
dc.titleReflective Thinking Predicts Disbelief in God Across 19 Countriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files