Reflective Thinking Predicts Disbelief in God Across 19 Countries
Loading...

Date
2025
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer
Open Access Color
HYBRID
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
In the present study, we tested three hypotheses about relationships between reflective thinking, intuitive thinking (both measured using the Cognitive Reflection Test; CRT), and belief in God or gods (BiG) in university students across 19 culturally and geographically diverse countries (n = 7,771). In support of our first hypothesis, we found a negative relationship between reflective thinking and BiG; and in support of our second hypothesis, we found a positive relationship between intuitive thinking and BiG. Contrary to our third hypothesis, we found no evidence that measuring CRT prior to measuring BiG decreased BiG. Given that this is the first large cross-cultural test of these hypotheses to have a preregistered analysis plan, the first to hold education constant across countries, and the first to use both Bayesian and frequentist methods, these results considerably bolster the evidence in support of the first two hypotheses and against the third hypothesis.
Description
Ross, Robert/0000-0001-8711-1675; Ghasemi, Omidreza/0000-0001-7511-5580
Keywords
Belief In God, Cognitive Reflection Test, Intuition, Prime, Reflection, Brief Report, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Male, Adult, Religion and Psychology, Adolescent, Cognitive Reflection, Thinking, Young Adult, Humans, Female, Intuition
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
1
Source
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Volume
32
Issue
Start Page
2220
End Page
2229
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 3
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 6
Google Scholar™


