Augmentation Mentoplasty Using a Custom-Design Wire Cage

gdc.relation.journal Journal of Craniofacial Surgery en_US
dc.contributor.author Erol ,O.
dc.contributor.author Enacar, A.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-06-27T08:00:56Z
dc.date.available 2019-06-27T08:00:56Z
dc.date.issued 2003
dc.description.abstract Mentoplasty is often a complimentary procedure to rhinoplasty. At least 25% of all rhinoplasty patients may need a chin implant to balance facial features better. Augmentation mentoplasty using alloplastic implants such as silicone rubber or other materials provides a simple approach to the treatment of the hypoplastic chin. Although these types of implants are readily available in developed countries there are parts of the world where they are unavailable or quite expensive. The authors have developed a chin implant made of wire that is available throughout the world and is custom designed to the mentum of the patient after a cephalometric evaluation. This technique has been used in 125 patients along with rhinoplasty over the last 20 years at our institution. In an initial series of 8 patients the prosthesis became displaced and was removed in 2 patients. Since then a new radiographic technique has been developed to demonstrate the shape of the mentum before surgery and new bone formation after surgery. By using this special radiographic technique it was possible to detect four types of mentum before surgery and to construct a custom-design wire cage according to this shape. The prosthesis is constructed by an orthodontist according to the cephalometric measurements and shape of the mentum. By using the buccal approach a pocket is prepared subperiosteally and a wire cage is inserted. In the last 20 cases the wire cage was filled with diced cartilage wrapped with Surgicel. The results were esthetically satisfactory in most patients. After the shape of the wire prosthesis was modified to conform to the shape of the underlying bone better no displacement of the prosthesis has been experienced. In 3 patients it was necessary to remove the prosthesis when new tissue formation began to fill the prosthesis. These specimens were examined histologically and the regenerating tissue was found to be connective tissue with a thin layer of bone formation. Most patients could be followed up for only 3 to 12 years. In all patients the results have been consistent and the procedure has been safe. en_US]
dc.identifier.citationcount 4
dc.identifier.doi 10.1097/00001665-200311000-00012 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1049-2275 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1049-2275
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85026150177 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/172
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200311000-00012
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Mentoplasty en_US
dc.subject Wire cage en_US
dc.subject Chin en_US
dc.subject Implant en_US
dc.subject Mentum en_US
dc.title Augmentation Mentoplasty Using a Custom-Design Wire Cage en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.endpage 892
gdc.description.issue 6
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q2
gdc.description.startpage 884 en_US
gdc.description.volume 14 en_US
gdc.identifier.openalex W1969256539
gdc.identifier.pmid 14600632 en_US
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000187561800011 en_US
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 2.0
gdc.oaire.influence 3.3841205E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.keywords Mentoplasty
gdc.oaire.keywords Male
gdc.oaire.keywords Chin
gdc.oaire.keywords Cephalometry
gdc.oaire.keywords Surface Properties
gdc.oaire.keywords Biocompatible Materials
gdc.oaire.keywords Prosthesis Design
gdc.oaire.keywords Hemostatics
gdc.oaire.keywords Wire cage
gdc.oaire.keywords Osteogenesis
gdc.oaire.keywords Periosteum
gdc.oaire.keywords Humans
gdc.oaire.keywords Cellulose, Oxidized
gdc.oaire.keywords Retrospective Studies
gdc.oaire.keywords Mentum
gdc.oaire.keywords Implant
gdc.oaire.keywords Prostheses and Implants
gdc.oaire.keywords Rhinoplasty
gdc.oaire.keywords Radiography
gdc.oaire.keywords Cartilage
gdc.oaire.keywords Connective Tissue
gdc.oaire.keywords Female
gdc.oaire.keywords Follow-Up Studies
gdc.oaire.popularity 6.721936E-10
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 03 medical and health sciences
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0302 clinical medicine
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.904
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.66
gdc.opencitations.count 5
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 5
gdc.plumx.mendeley 18
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 4
gdc.scopus.citedcount 4
gdc.wos.citedcount 4
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication b20623fc-1264-4244-9847-a4729ca7508c
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery b20623fc-1264-4244-9847-a4729ca7508c

Files