The Choice of Law in the Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights by Soft Law Provisions

dc.contributor.authorÖmeroğlu, Ekin
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-19T15:11:58Z
dc.date.available2023-10-19T15:11:58Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.department-temp[Omeroglu, Ekin] Kadir Has Univ, Hukuk Fak, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study deals with the party autonomy principle as a connecting factor in the infringement of intellectual property rights in the light of soft law provisions. The territoriality principle and the lex loci protectionis rule govern as the main doctrines of law applicable to intellectual property infringement disputes. However, several academic projects from all over the world (the Principles by the American Law Institute, the Principles by the European Max Planck Group on Conflict of Laws in Intellectual Property, the Japanese Transparency Proposal, the Joint Principles drafted by members of the Private International Law Association of Korea, Japanese Waseda University Global COE Project and the Draft Guidelines on Intellectual Property in Private International Law of The International Law Association Intellectual Property and Private International Law Committee) suggested the party autonomy principle for the infringement of intellectual property rights in contrast to Article 8(3) of the Rome II Regulation. All these principles have no legally binding effect, but they are a set of principles that could be used both by international and national legislative bodies and courts. Moreover, the party autonomy principle in intellectual property infringement cases has been accepted by Turkish Private International Law Act (PILA), Swiss PILA and Chinese PILA. The purpose of this study is to analyse both soft law and national law provisions comparatively. Although the common aspect of the legal principles is to accept the will of the party, all of the provisions differ in several aspects. This study attempts to analyse and evaluate the suggested developments of the choice of law for intellectual property infringement cases.en_US
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi10.26650/ppil.2020.40.1.0001en_US
dc.identifier.endpage77en_US
dc.identifier.issn2651-5377
dc.identifier.issn2667-4114
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage55en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinidhttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/396239en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2020.40.1.0001
dc.identifier.uri396239
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/5296
dc.identifier.volume40en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000799111800003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.institutionauthorOmeroglu, Ekin
dc.khas20231019-WoSen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherIstanbul Univen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPublic and Private International Law Bulletinen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectIntellectual property rightsen_US
dc.subjectTortsen_US
dc.subjectChoice of lawen_US
dc.subjectSoft lawen_US
dc.subjectApplicable lawen_US
dc.titleThe Choice of Law in the Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights by Soft Law Provisionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationef55e01f-1008-46ab-b848-e9b4a256fa66
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryef55e01f-1008-46ab-b848-e9b4a256fa66

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
5296.pdf
Size:
508.31 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Tam Metin / Full Text