On the Generalisation Performance of Geometric Semantic Genetic Programming for Boolean Functions: Learning Block Mutations
Loading...

Date
2024
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
Open Access Color
HYBRID
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
In this article, we present the first rigorous theoretical analysis of the generalisation performance of a Geometric Semantic Genetic Programming (GSGP) system. More specifically, we consider a hill-climber using the GSGP Fixed Block Mutation (FBM) operator for the domain of Boolean functions. We prove that the algorithm cannot evolve Boolean conjunctions of arbitrary size that are correct on unseen inputs chosen uniformly at random from the complete truth table i.e., it generalises poorly. Two algorithms based on the Varying Block Mutation (VBM) operator are proposed and analysed to address the issue. We rigorously prove that under the uniform distribution the first one can efficiently evolve any Boolean function of constant size with respect to the number of available variables, while the second one can efficiently evolve general conjunctions or disjunctions of any size without requiring prior knowledge of the target function class. An experimental analysis confirms the theoretical insights for realistic problem sizes and indicates the superiority of the proposed operators also for small parity functions not explicitly covered by the theory. © 2024 Copyright held by the owner/author(s).
Description
Keywords
Boolean Functions, Geometric Semantic Genetic Programming, Runtime Analysis
Fields of Science
0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 0102 computer and information sciences, 02 engineering and technology, 01 natural sciences
Citation
WoS Q
N/A
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
1
Source
ACM Transactions on Evolutionary Learning and Optimization
Volume
4
Issue
4
Start Page
87
End Page
88
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 2
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 2
SCOPUS™ Citations
2
checked on Feb 27, 2026
Page Views
9
checked on Feb 27, 2026
Google Scholar™


