Does off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery reduce mortality in high risk patients?

dc.contributor.author Akpınar, Belhhan
dc.contributor.author Güden, Mustafa
dc.contributor.author Sanisoğlu, İlhan
dc.contributor.author Sağbaş, Ertan
dc.contributor.author Caynak, Barış
dc.contributor.author Bayramoğlu, Zehra
dc.contributor.author Bayındır, Osman
dc.date.accessioned 2019-06-27T08:01:05Z
dc.date.available 2019-06-27T08:01:05Z
dc.date.issued 2001
dc.description.abstract Background: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare outcome in two groups of patients who were classified according to their risk groups and underwent coronary revascularization with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. Material and Methods: Between January 1996 and July 2000 480 cases that underwent coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) were included in a retrospective nonrandomized manner for study. Group I included 210 patients who were revascularized using off-pump techniques. Octopus 2 and 3 (Medtronic Inc. Minneapolis MN) were used for tissue stabilization. Group 2 included 270 cases who underwent CABG using CPB. Emergency cases combined operations reoperations and patients in cardiogenic shock were excluded. Demographic variables were comparable between two the groups. Using the Allegheny Clinic Risk Scoring Scale [Magovern 1996] patients in both groups were scored as low moderate and high risk. In Group 1 37% of patients consisted of high risk patients while Group 2 had 14% (p < 0.05) Student's t-test and chi-square test were used for statistical analysis and alfa < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Mortality was 1.4% in Group 1 and 1.5% in Group 2 (p = ns). Mean anastomosis per patient was 2.6 +/- 0.6 in Group 1 and 3.2 +/- 0.5 in Group 2 (p < 0.05). Patients in Group I needed less blood transfusions and less inotropic support postoperatively (p < 0.05). There were also fewer minor neurological events (p < 0.05) and pulmonary complications (Type 2) in Group 1. Atrial fibrillation rate infection and major neurological deficit (Type 1) were similar in both groups. Mortality was less among Group 1 high risk patients (3.9%) in comparison to Group 2 high risk patients (7.9%) but this did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: In low or moderate risk patients CABG can be performed safely with or without CPB. In high risk patients with several comorbidities off-pump CABG seems to be a safe and efficient method that can improve outcome. en_US]
dc.identifier.issn 1098-3511 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1522-6662 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1098-3511
dc.identifier.issn 1522-6662
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-0034799721 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/247
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Forum Multimedia Publishing LLC. en_US
dc.relation.ispartof The heart surgery forum
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.title Does off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery reduce mortality in high risk patients? en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.institutional Sanisoğlu, İlhan en_US
gdc.author.institutional Sağbaş, Ertan en_US
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C4
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.endpage 236
gdc.description.issue 3
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q4
gdc.description.startpage 231 en_US
gdc.description.volume 4 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality Q4
gdc.identifier.openalex W2469812664
gdc.identifier.pmid 11673143 en_US
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000171126400010 en_US
gdc.oaire.accesstype GOLD
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 4.0
gdc.oaire.influence 3.5285919E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.keywords Male
gdc.oaire.keywords Risk
gdc.oaire.keywords Cardiopulmonary Bypass
gdc.oaire.keywords Chi-Square Distribution
gdc.oaire.keywords Humans
gdc.oaire.keywords Female
gdc.oaire.keywords Coronary Artery Bypass
gdc.oaire.keywords Aged
gdc.oaire.keywords Retrospective Studies
gdc.oaire.popularity 5.116887E-10
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 03 medical and health sciences
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0302 clinical medicine
gdc.openalex.fwci 2.457
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.62
gdc.opencitations.count 9
gdc.plumx.mendeley 13
gdc.plumx.pubmedcites 1
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 11
gdc.relation.journal The Heart Surgery Forum
gdc.scopus.citedcount 11
gdc.wos.citedcount 8
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication b20623fc-1264-4244-9847-a4729ca7508c
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery b20623fc-1264-4244-9847-a4729ca7508c

Files