The role of posterior pericardiotomy on the incidence of atrial fibrillation after coronary revascularization
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2003
Authors
Arbatlı, Harun
Demirsoy, Ergun
Aytekin, Saide
Rızaoğlu, E.
Ünal, M.
Yağan, N.
Sönmez, Bingür
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Edizioni Minerva Medica
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Aim. Pericardial effusion and atrial fibrillation (AF) are two common complications in coronary revascularization surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of posterior pericardiotomy in pericardial. effusion and AF. Methods. This randomized prospective study includes 113 patients who underwent isolated CABG procedure between May 2000 and December 2000 in our hospital. Posterior pericardiotomy incision was done in Group I (n=54). Group II constituted the control group (n=59). Postoperative pericardial. effusion was assessed by echocardiography and rhythm follow-up was done by the same cardiologist. Results. There was no significant difference between study group and the control group considering the chest drainage (940.18 +/- 367.96 vs 894.92 +/- 360.65
P=0.507). The number of patients with remarkable intrapericardial effusion (>50 ml) was significantly lower in the posterior pericardiotomy group (25-93% vs 47.45% p=0.020). The incidence of postoperative AF was no different between the posterior pericardiotomy group and the control group (12.96% vs 20-34%
P=0.32). in both groups the incidence of AF was significantly higher in patients with mild or moderate pericardial effusion (29%) compared to patients with no or minimal pericardial effusion (10%) (p=0.017). Conclusion. Posterior pericardiotomy significantly reduces the pericardial effusion in coronary bypass procedure postoperatively. Patients with pericardial. effusion were subjected to AF more frequently.
P=0.507). The number of patients with remarkable intrapericardial effusion (>50 ml) was significantly lower in the posterior pericardiotomy group (25-93% vs 47.45% p=0.020). The incidence of postoperative AF was no different between the posterior pericardiotomy group and the control group (12.96% vs 20-34%
P=0.32). in both groups the incidence of AF was significantly higher in patients with mild or moderate pericardial effusion (29%) compared to patients with no or minimal pericardial effusion (10%) (p=0.017). Conclusion. Posterior pericardiotomy significantly reduces the pericardial effusion in coronary bypass procedure postoperatively. Patients with pericardial. effusion were subjected to AF more frequently.
Description
Keywords
Pericardial effusion, Pericardiectomy, Atrial fibrillation, Coronory artery bypass, Male, Incidence, Coronary Disease, Middle Aged, Risk Assessment, Severity of Illness Index, Pericardial Effusion, Electrocardiography, Postoperative Complications, Reference Values, Pericardiectomy, Atrial Fibrillation, Myocardial Revascularization, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Coronary Artery Bypass, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Probability, Pericardial effusion, Coronory artery bypass, Atrial fibrillation
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine
Citation
WoS Q
Q3
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
13
Source
The Journal of cardiovascular surgery
Volume
44
Issue
6
Start Page
713
End Page
717
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 34
PubMed : 16
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 13
Google Scholar™

OpenAlex FWCI
0.21985066
Sustainable Development Goals
3
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING

7
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY

9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE

11
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES

15
LIFE ON LAND

17
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS


