A Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Terms Set-Based Ahp-Topsis Approach To Evaluate Erp Software Packages

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2020

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Top 10%
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

Purpose In this paper, two popular multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods with hesitant fuzzy logic approach; hesitant fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (hesitant F-AHP) and hesitant fuzzy the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (HF-TOPSIS) are integrated as HF-AHP-TOPSIS to evaluating a set of enterprise resource planning (ERP) alternatives and rank them by weight to reach to the ultimate one that satisfies the needs and expectations of a company. Design/methodology/approach Selecting the best ERP software package among the rising number of the options in market has been a critical problem for most companies for a long time because of the reason that an improper ERP software package might lead to many issues (i.e. time loss, increased costs and a loss of market share). On the other hand, finding the best ERP alternative is a comprehensive MCDM problem in the presence of a set of alternatives and several potentially competing quantitative and qualitative criteria. Findings In this integrated approach, the hesitant F-AHP is used to determine the criteria weights, as the hesitant F-TOPSIS is utilized to rank ERP package alternatives. The proposed approach was also validated in a numerical example that has five ERP package alternatives and 12 criteria by three decision-makers in order to show its applicability to potential readers and practitioners. Research limitations/implications If the number of the alternatives and criteria are dramatically increased beyond reasonable numbers, the reaching to final solution will be so difficult because of the great deal of fuzzy based calculations. Therefore, the number of criteria and alternatives should be at reasonable numbers. Practical implications The proposed approach was also validated in a illustrated example with the five ERP package options and 12 criteria by the three decision-makers in order to show its applicability to potential readers and practitioners. Originality/value Furthermore, in literature, to the best of our knowledge, the authors did not come cross any work that integrates the HF-AHP with the HF-TOPSIS for ERP software package selection problem.

Description

Keywords

Enterprise resource planning (ERP) package selection, Hesitant fuzzy logic, Multiple-criteria decision-making, Analytic hierarchy process (AHP), Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), Multiple-criteria decision-making, Enterprise resource planning (ERP) package selection, Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), Analytic hierarchy process (AHP), Hesitant fuzzy logic

Fields of Science

0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology

Citation

WoS Q

Q2

Scopus Q

Q1
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
25

Source

International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics

Volume

14

Issue

Start Page

54

End Page

77
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 25

Scopus : 26

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 41

SCOPUS™ Citations

30

checked on Feb 21, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

28

checked on Feb 21, 2026

Page Views

7

checked on Feb 21, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
4.27140494

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available