A Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Terms Set-Based Ahp-Topsis Approach To Evaluate Erp Software Packages

gdc.relation.journal International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics en_US
dc.contributor.author Ayağ, Zeki
dc.contributor.author Samanlıoğlu, Funda
dc.contributor.other Industrial Engineering
dc.contributor.other 05. Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences
dc.contributor.other 01. Kadir Has University
dc.date.accessioned 2021-01-28T10:42:40Z
dc.date.available 2021-01-28T10:42:40Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.description.abstract Purpose In this paper, two popular multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods with hesitant fuzzy logic approach; hesitant fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (hesitant F-AHP) and hesitant fuzzy the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (HF-TOPSIS) are integrated as HF-AHP-TOPSIS to evaluating a set of enterprise resource planning (ERP) alternatives and rank them by weight to reach to the ultimate one that satisfies the needs and expectations of a company. Design/methodology/approach Selecting the best ERP software package among the rising number of the options in market has been a critical problem for most companies for a long time because of the reason that an improper ERP software package might lead to many issues (i.e. time loss, increased costs and a loss of market share). On the other hand, finding the best ERP alternative is a comprehensive MCDM problem in the presence of a set of alternatives and several potentially competing quantitative and qualitative criteria. Findings In this integrated approach, the hesitant F-AHP is used to determine the criteria weights, as the hesitant F-TOPSIS is utilized to rank ERP package alternatives. The proposed approach was also validated in a numerical example that has five ERP package alternatives and 12 criteria by three decision-makers in order to show its applicability to potential readers and practitioners. Research limitations/implications If the number of the alternatives and criteria are dramatically increased beyond reasonable numbers, the reaching to final solution will be so difficult because of the great deal of fuzzy based calculations. Therefore, the number of criteria and alternatives should be at reasonable numbers. Practical implications The proposed approach was also validated in a illustrated example with the five ERP package options and 12 criteria by the three decision-makers in order to show its applicability to potential readers and practitioners. Originality/value Furthermore, in literature, to the best of our knowledge, the authors did not come cross any work that integrates the HF-AHP with the HF-TOPSIS for ERP software package selection problem. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 20
dc.identifier.doi 10.1108/IJICC-07-2020-0079 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1756-378X en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1756-3798 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1756-378X
dc.identifier.issn 1756-3798
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85097226322 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/3766
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1108/IJICC-07-2020-0079
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Emerald Group Publishing Ltd en_US
dc.relation.ispartof International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Enterprise resource planning (ERP) package selection en_US
dc.subject Hesitant fuzzy logic en_US
dc.subject Multiple-criteria decision-making en_US
dc.subject Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) en_US
dc.subject Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) en_US
dc.title A Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Terms Set-Based Ahp-Topsis Approach To Evaluate Erp Software Packages en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.institutional Ayaǧ, Zeki en_US
gdc.author.institutional Samanlıoğlu, Funda
gdc.author.institutional Ayağ, Zeki
gdc.bip.impulseclass C4
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C4
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department Fakülteler, Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi, Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümü en_US
gdc.description.endpage 77
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q2
gdc.description.startpage 54
gdc.description.volume 14
gdc.identifier.openalex W3112577414
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000597950300001 en_US
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 18.0
gdc.oaire.influence 3.456337E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.keywords Multiple-criteria decision-making
gdc.oaire.keywords Enterprise resource planning (ERP) package selection
gdc.oaire.keywords Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS)
gdc.oaire.keywords Analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
gdc.oaire.keywords Hesitant fuzzy logic
gdc.oaire.popularity 2.3408566E-8
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 02 engineering and technology
gdc.openalex.fwci 3.492
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.88
gdc.opencitations.count 22
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 25
gdc.plumx.mendeley 39
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 28
gdc.scopus.citedcount 28
gdc.wos.citedcount 27
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 4e74c274-0592-4792-ac57-00061bd273aa
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 08cbab4b-8ed5-48fe-bb67-0488cc0af5a3
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 4e74c274-0592-4792-ac57-00061bd273aa
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 28868d0c-e9a4-4de1-822f-c8df06d2086a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 2457b9b3-3a3f-4c17-8674-7f874f030d96
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication b20623fc-1264-4244-9847-a4729ca7508c
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 28868d0c-e9a4-4de1-822f-c8df06d2086a

Files