A Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Terms Set-Based Ahp-Topsis Approach To Evaluate Erp Software Packages

dc.contributor.author Ayağ, Zeki
dc.contributor.author Samanlıoğlu, Funda
dc.contributor.author Samanlıoğlu, Funda
dc.contributor.author Ayağ, Zeki
dc.contributor.other Industrial Engineering
dc.date.accessioned 2021-01-28T10:42:40Z
dc.date.available 2021-01-28T10:42:40Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.department Fakülteler, Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi, Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümü en_US
dc.description.abstract Purpose In this paper, two popular multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods with hesitant fuzzy logic approach; hesitant fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (hesitant F-AHP) and hesitant fuzzy the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (HF-TOPSIS) are integrated as HF-AHP-TOPSIS to evaluating a set of enterprise resource planning (ERP) alternatives and rank them by weight to reach to the ultimate one that satisfies the needs and expectations of a company. Design/methodology/approach Selecting the best ERP software package among the rising number of the options in market has been a critical problem for most companies for a long time because of the reason that an improper ERP software package might lead to many issues (i.e. time loss, increased costs and a loss of market share). On the other hand, finding the best ERP alternative is a comprehensive MCDM problem in the presence of a set of alternatives and several potentially competing quantitative and qualitative criteria. Findings In this integrated approach, the hesitant F-AHP is used to determine the criteria weights, as the hesitant F-TOPSIS is utilized to rank ERP package alternatives. The proposed approach was also validated in a numerical example that has five ERP package alternatives and 12 criteria by three decision-makers in order to show its applicability to potential readers and practitioners. Research limitations/implications If the number of the alternatives and criteria are dramatically increased beyond reasonable numbers, the reaching to final solution will be so difficult because of the great deal of fuzzy based calculations. Therefore, the number of criteria and alternatives should be at reasonable numbers. Practical implications The proposed approach was also validated in a illustrated example with the five ERP package options and 12 criteria by the three decision-makers in order to show its applicability to potential readers and practitioners. Originality/value Furthermore, in literature, to the best of our knowledge, the authors did not come cross any work that integrates the HF-AHP with the HF-TOPSIS for ERP software package selection problem. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 20
dc.identifier.doi 10.1108/IJICC-07-2020-0079 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1756-378X en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1756-3798 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1756-378X
dc.identifier.issn 1756-3798
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85097226322 en_US
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q2
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12469/3766
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1108/IJICC-07-2020-0079
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000597950300001 en_US
dc.institutionauthor Ayaǧ, Zeki en_US
dc.institutionauthor Samanlıoğlu, Funda en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Emerald Group Publishing Ltd en_US
dc.relation.journal International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 28
dc.subject Enterprise resource planning (ERP) package selection en_US
dc.subject Hesitant fuzzy logic en_US
dc.subject Multiple-criteria decision-making en_US
dc.subject Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) en_US
dc.subject Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) en_US
dc.title A Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Terms Set-Based Ahp-Topsis Approach To Evaluate Erp Software Packages en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 27
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 4e74c274-0592-4792-ac57-00061bd273aa
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 08cbab4b-8ed5-48fe-bb67-0488cc0af5a3
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 4e74c274-0592-4792-ac57-00061bd273aa
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 28868d0c-e9a4-4de1-822f-c8df06d2086a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 28868d0c-e9a4-4de1-822f-c8df06d2086a

Files